Literature DB >> 11698506

Constraints on somatotopic organization in the primary motor cortex.

M H Schieber1.   

Abstract

Since the 1870s, the primary motor cortex (M1) has been known to have a somatotopic organization, with different regions of cortex participating in control of face, arm, and leg movements. Through the middle of the 20th century, it seemed possible that the principle of somatotopic organization extended to the detailed representation of different body parts within each of the three major representations. The arm region of M1, for example, was thought to contain a well-ordered, point-to-point representation of the movements or muscles of the thumb, index, middle, ring, and little fingers, the wrist, elbow, and shoulder, as conveyed by the iconic homunculus and simiusculus. In the last quarter of the 20th century, however, experimental evidence has accumulated indicating that within-limb somatotopy in M1 is not spatially discrete nor sequentially ordered. Rather, beneath gradual somatotopic gradients of representation, the representations of different smaller body parts or muscles each are distributed widely within the face, arm, or leg representation, such that the representations of any two smaller parts overlap extensively. Appreciation of this underlying organization will be essential to further understanding of the contribution to control of movement made by M1. Because no single experiment disproves a well-ordered within-limb somatotopic organization in M1, here I review the accumulated evidence, using a framework of six major features that constrain the somatotopic organization of M1: convergence of output, divergence of output, horizontal interconnections, distributed activation, effects of lesions, and ability to reorganize. Review of the classic experiments that led to development of the homunculus and simiusculus shows that these data too were consistent with distributed within-limb somatotopy. I conclude with speculations on what the constrained somatotopy of M1 might tell us about its contribution to control of movement.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11698506     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.5.2125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  163 in total

1.  Finger interaction during multi-finger tasks involving finger addition and removal.

Authors:  Sheng Li; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Age-related changes in optimality and motor variability: an example of multifinger redundant tasks.

Authors:  Jaebum Park; Yao Sun; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Cortical networks subserving upper limb movements in primates.

Authors:  J H Kaas; I Stepniewska; O Gharbawie
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.874

Review 4.  Governing coordination: behavioural principles and neural correlates.

Authors:  R G Carson; J A S Kelso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Functional somatotopy of finger representations in human primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Peter Dechent; Jens Frahm
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Prehension synergies during nonvertical grasping, I: experimental observations.

Authors:  Todd C Pataky; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals asymmetrical efficacy of intracortical circuits in primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Geoff Hammond; Deb Faulkner; Michelle Byrnes; Frank Mastaglia; Gary Thickbroom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Brain mechanisms for the formation of new movements during learning: the evolution of classical concepts.

Authors:  M E Ioffe
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-01

9.  Pyramidal tract neurons receptive to different forelimb joints act differently during locomotion.

Authors:  Erik E Stout; Irina N Beloozerova
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Age-related changes in the control of finger force vectors.

Authors:  Shweta Kapur; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.