Literature DB >> 19895775

Have I had one drink too many? Assessing gender differences in misperceptions of intoxication among college students.

Kimberly A Mallett1, Rob Turrisi, Mary E Larimer, Nadine R Mastroleo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study extends the literature on factors involved in college students' drinking tendencies by examining differences between men and women in their ability to accurately estimate personal intoxication. The study also assessed whether men and women who typically consume large quantities of alcohol when they attend parties have more difficulty accurately assessing intoxication compared with lighter drinkers.
METHOD: The research used the external cueing approach (ECA) of Turrisi and colleagues as the informational paradigm to examine 3,707 college students' gender, typical drinking at parties, and how they relate to perceptions of intoxication.
RESULTS: The study revealed that approximately 20% (n = 710) of participants underestimated their blood alcohol concentration using the ECA. Among participants who made underestimation errors, gender differences were observed in that women made significantly more underestimation errors in the scenarios that contained four to five drinks and men made more underestimation errors in the scenarios that contained six to seven drinks. In addition, a three-way interaction revealed that female students who reported typically drinking larger amounts of alcohol in party settings were more likely to make errors when estimating their intoxication for moderately high numbers of drinks (e.g., four to five drinks).
CONCLUSIONS: The results are discussed in terms of examining the importance of college student drinking, gender, typical alcohol consumption at a party, and estimation of intoxication. Implications of gender effects in relation to high-risk drinking activities (i.e., pregaming and drinking games) as well as prevention efforts are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19895775      PMCID: PMC2776126          DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs        ISSN: 1937-1888            Impact factor:   2.582


  33 in total

1.  Examination of judgments of drunkenness, binge drinking, and drunk-driving tendencies in teens with and without a family history of alcohol abuse.

Authors:  R Turrisi; K Wiersma
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Perception of intoxication and blood alcohol concentration of drinkers in social settings.

Authors:  C E Werch
Journal:  Int J Addict       Date:  1990-03

3.  Prevention of heavy drinking and associated negative consequences among mandated and voluntary college students.

Authors:  Kim Fromme; William Corbin
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2004-12

4.  College students lack knowledge of standard drink volumes: implications for definitions of risky drinking based on survey data.

Authors:  Aaron M White; Courtney L Kraus; Julie D Flom; Lori A Kestenbaum; Jamie R Mitchell; Kunal Shah; H Scott Swartzwelder
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Two brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students.

Authors:  Brian Borsari; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2005-09

6.  Do we learn from our mistakes? An examination of the impact of negative alcohol-related consequences on college students' drinking patterns and perceptions.

Authors:  Kimberly A Mallett; Christine M Lee; Clayton Neighbors; Mary E Larimer; Rob Turrisi
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2006-03

7.  Measuring excessive alcohol use in college drinking contexts: the Drinking Context Scale.

Authors:  T O'Hare
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Cognitive processes and individual differences in judgments relevant to drunk driving.

Authors:  J Jaccard; R Turrisi
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-07

9.  Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: results from a 2-year follow-up assessment.

Authors:  G A Marlatt; J S Baer; D R Kivlahan; L A Dimeff; M E Larimer; L A Quigley; J M Somers; E Williams
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1998-08

10.  Changes in binge drinking and related problems among American college students between 1993 and 1997. Results of the Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study.

Authors:  H Wechsler; G W Dowdall; G Maenner; J Gledhill-Hoyt; H Lee
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  1998-09
View more
  7 in total

1.  How estimation of drinking influences alcohol-related consequences across the first year of college.

Authors:  Brittney A Hultgren; Michael J Cleveland; Rob Turrisi; Kimberly A Mallett
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  An Event-Level Investigation of Factors Associated With Young Women's Experiences of Coerced Consensual Sex.

Authors:  Cynthia A Stappenbeck; Jeanette Norris; Rhiana Wegner; Amanda E B Bryan; Kelly Cue Davis; Tina Zawacki; Devon A Abdallah; William H George
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2016-12-22

3.  Brief Motivational Interventions Are Associated With Reductions in Alcohol-Impaired Driving Among College Drinkers.

Authors:  Jenni B Teeters; Brian Borsari; Matthew P Martens; James G Murphy
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.582

4.  Artificial sweeteners versus regular mixers increase breath alcohol concentrations in male and female social drinkers.

Authors:  Cecile A Marczinski; Amy L Stamates
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Gender differences in natural language factors of subjective intoxication in college students: an experimental vignette study.

Authors:  Ash Levitt; Robert C Schlauch; Bruce D Bartholow; Kenneth J Sher
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Does a Brief Motivational Intervention Reduce Frequency of Pregaming in Mandated Students?

Authors:  Brian Borsari; Jennifer E Merrill; Ali Yurasek; Mary Beth Miller; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.164

7.  The Effect of Descriptive Norms on Pregaming Frequency: Tests of Five Moderators.

Authors:  Jennifer E Merrill; Shannon R Kenney; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.164

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.