Literature DB >> 19894062

Endogenous cueing attenuates object substitution masking.

Filip Germeys1, I Pomianowska, P De Graef, P Zaenen, K Verfaillie.   

Abstract

Object substitution masking (OSM) is a form of visual masking in which a briefly presented target surrounded by four small dots is masked by the continuing presence of the four dots after target offset. A major parameter in the prediction of OSM is the time required for attention to be directed to the target following its onset. Object substitution theory (Di Lollo et al. in J Exp Psychol Gen 129:481-507, 2000) predicts that the sooner attention can be focused at the target's location, the less masking will ensue. However, recently Luiga and Bachmann (Psychol Res 71:634-640, 2007) presented evidence that precueing of attention to the target location prior to target-plus-mask onset by means of a central (endogenous) arrow cue does not reduce OSM. When attention was cued exogenously, OSM was attenuated. Based on these results, Luiga and Bachmann argued that object substitution theory should be adapted by differentiating the ways of directing attention to the target location. The goal of the present study was to further examine the dissociation between the effects of endogenous and exogenous precueing on OSM. Contrary to Luiga and Bachmann, our results show that prior shifts of attention to the target location initiated by both exogenous and endogenous cues reduce OSM as predicted by object substitution theory and its computational model CMOS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19894062     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0263-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  25 in total

1.  Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes.

Authors:  V Di Lollo; J T Enns; R A Rensink
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-12

Review 2.  Integrated model of visual processing.

Authors:  J Bullier
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2001-10

3.  Gestalt grouping and common onset masking.

Authors:  Todd A Kahan; Katherine M Mathis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-11

4.  Warning: attending to a mask may be hazardous to your perception.

Authors:  Mathew S Tata; Deborah E Giaschi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

5.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption.

Authors:  H J Müller; P M Rabbitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Different effects of the two types of spatial pre-cueing: what precisely is "attention" in Di Lollo's and Enns' substitution masking theory?

Authors:  I Luiga; T Bachmann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-27

7.  Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention.

Authors:  D LaBerge; V Brown; M Carter; D Bash; A Hartley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Object substitution masking: when does mask preview work?

Authors:  Stephen Wee Hun Lim; Fook K Chua
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination.

Authors:  M Cheal; D R Lyon
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-11

10.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries.

Authors:  A Treisman; S Gormican
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.