Literature DB >> 19893714

Change of lumbar motion after multi-level posterior dynamic stabilization with bioflex system : 1 year follow up.

Hunho Park1, Ho-Yeol Zhang, Bo Young Cho, Jeong Yoon Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the change of range of motion (ROM) at the segments within the dynamic posterior stabilization, segments above and below the system, the clinical course and analyzed the factors influencing them.
METHODS: This study included a consecutive 27 patients who underwent one-level to three-level dynamic stabilization with Bioflex system at our institute. All of these patients with degenerative disc disease underwent decompressive laminectomy with/without discectomy and dynamic stabilization with Bioflex system at the laminectomy level without fusion. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, whole lumbar lordosis (from L1 to S1), ROMs from preoperative, immediate postoperative, 1.5, 3, 6, 12 months at whole lumbar (from L1 to S1), each instrumented levels, and one segment above and below this instrumentation were evaluated.
RESULTS: VAS scores for leg and back pain decreased significantly throughout the whole study period. Whole lumbar lordosis remained within preoperative range, ROM of whole lumbar and instrumented levels showed a significant decrease. ROM of one level upper and lower to the instrumentation increased, but statistically invalid. There were also 5 cases of complications related with the fixation system.
CONCLUSION: Bioflex posterior dynamic stabilization system supports operation-induced unstable, destroyed segments and assists in physiological motion and stabilization at the instrumented level, decrease back and leg pain, maintain preoperative lumbar lordotic angle and reduce ROM of whole lumbar and instrumented segments. Prevention of adjacent segment degeneration and complication rates are something to be reconsidered through longer follow up period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjacent segment; Bioflex system; Lumbar spine; Posterior dynamic stabilization; ROM

Year:  2009        PMID: 19893714      PMCID: PMC2773382          DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2009.46.4.285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc        ISSN: 1225-8245


  17 in total

1.  Fulcrum assisted soft stabilization system: a new concept in the surgical treatment of degenerative low back pain.

Authors:  Dilip K Sengupta; Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Nitinol spring rod dynamic stabilization system and Nitinol memory loops in surgical treatment for lumbar disc disorders: short-term follow up.

Authors:  Young-Soo Kim; Ho-Yeol Zhang; Byung-Jin Moon; Kyung-Woo Park; Kyu-Yeul Ji; Won-Chang Lee; Kyu-Sung Oh; Gwon-Ui Ryu; Daniel H Kim
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Flexible rods and the case for dynamic stabilization.

Authors:  Jason M Highsmith; Luis M Tumialán; Gerald E Rodts
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 4.047

4.  Comparison of the load-sharing characteristics between pedicle-based dynamic and rigid rod devices.

Authors:  Yoon-Ho Ahn; Wen-Ming Chen; Kwon-Yong Lee; Kyung-Woo Park; Sung-Jae Lee
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 3.715

5.  Disc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments after Dynesys dynamic stabilization system after two years.

Authors:  Abhishek Kumar; James Beastall; Justin Hughes; Efthimios J Karadimas; Malcolm Nicol; Francis Smith; Douglas Wardlaw
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Treatment of symptomatic flatback after spinal fusion.

Authors:  M O Lagrone; D S Bradford; J H Moe; J E Lonstein; R B Winter; J W Ogilvie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Graf ligament stabilisation: mid- to long-term follow-up.

Authors:  M C Rigby; G P Selmon; M A Foy; A J Fogg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization.

Authors:  Stefan Schaeren; Ivan Broger; Bernhard Jeanneret
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Dynamic stabilization of lumbar motion segments by use of Graf's ligaments: results with an average follow-up of 7.4 years in 39 highly selected, consecutive patients.

Authors:  T-M Markwalder; M Wenger
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  A pilot study to evaluate the effectiveness of small intestinal submucosa used to repair spinal ligaments in the goat.

Authors:  Eric H Ledet; Allen L Carl; Darryl J DiRisio; Michael P Tymeson; Lucille B Andersen; Christine E Sheehan; Bhaskar Kallakury; Michael Slivka; Hassan Serhan
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Do in vivo kinematic studies provide insight into adjacent segment degeneration? A qualitative systematic literature review.

Authors:  Masoud Malakoutian; David Volkheimer; John Street; Marcel F Dvorak; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Posterior Decompression and Fusion: Whole-Spine Functional and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Anastasia Topalidou; George Tzagarakis; Konstantine Balalis; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.