Yue Li1, Xueya Cai, Dana B Mukamel, Laurent G Glance. 1. Health Policy Research Institute, and Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. yli11@uci.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extensive evidence has demonstrated a relationship between patient volume and improved clinical outcomes in hospital care. This study sought to determine whether a similar association exists between nursing home volume of long-term care residents and rates of decline in physical function. METHODS: We conducted retrospective analyses on the 2004 and 2005 Minimum Data Set files that contain 605,433 eligible long-term residents in 9336 nursing homes. The outcome was defined following the federal "Nursing Home Compare" measure that captures changes in 4 basic activities of daily living status between 2 consecutive quarters. Both the outcome measure and nursing home volume were defined on the basis of long-term care residents. We estimated random-effects logistic regression models to quantify the independent impact of volume on functional decline. RESULTS: As volume increased, nursing home's unadjusted rate of functional decline tended to be lower. After multivariate adjustment for baseline resident characteristics and the nesting of residents within facilities, the odds ratio of activities of daily living decline was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.79-0.86, P < 0.000) for residents in high-volume nursing homes (>101 residents/facility), compared with residents in low-volume facilities (30-51 residents/facility). CONCLUSIONS: High volume of long-term care residents in a nursing home is associated with overall less functional decline. Further studies are needed to test other important nursing home outcomes, and explore various institutional, staffing, and resource attributes that underlie this volume-outcome association for long-term care. Understanding how greater experience of high-volume facilities leads to better resident outcome may help guide quality improvement efforts in nursing homes.
BACKGROUND: Extensive evidence has demonstrated a relationship between patient volume and improved clinical outcomes in hospital care. This study sought to determine whether a similar association exists between nursing home volume of long-term care residents and rates of decline in physical function. METHODS: We conducted retrospective analyses on the 2004 and 2005 Minimum Data Set files that contain 605,433 eligible long-term residents in 9336 nursing homes. The outcome was defined following the federal "Nursing Home Compare" measure that captures changes in 4 basic activities of daily living status between 2 consecutive quarters. Both the outcome measure and nursing home volume were defined on the basis of long-term care residents. We estimated random-effects logistic regression models to quantify the independent impact of volume on functional decline. RESULTS: As volume increased, nursing home's unadjusted rate of functional decline tended to be lower. After multivariate adjustment for baseline resident characteristics and the nesting of residents within facilities, the odds ratio of activities of daily living decline was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.79-0.86, P < 0.000) for residents in high-volume nursing homes (>101 residents/facility), compared with residents in low-volume facilities (30-51 residents/facility). CONCLUSIONS: High volume of long-term care residents in a nursing home is associated with overall less functional decline. Further studies are needed to test other important nursing home outcomes, and explore various institutional, staffing, and resource attributes that underlie this volume-outcome association for long-term care. Understanding how greater experience of high-volume facilities leads to better resident outcome may help guide quality improvement efforts in nursing homes.
Authors: Dana B Mukamel; William D Spector; Jacqueline S Zinn; Lynn Huang; David L Weimer; Ann Dozier Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Dana B Mukamel; Laurent G Glance; Yue Li; David L Weimer; William D Spector; Jacqueline S Zinn; Laura Mosqueda Journal: Med Care Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Dana B Mukamel; David L Weimer; William D Spector; Heather Ladd; Jacqueline S Zinn Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: John D Birkmeyer; Therese A Stukel; Andrea E Siewers; Philip P Goodney; David E Wennberg; F Lee Lucas Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-11-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Vincent Mor; Joseph Angelelli; Richard Jones; Jason Roy; Terry Moore; John Morris Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2003-11-04 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Rie Sakai-Bizmark; Laurie A Mena; Hiraku Kumamaru; Ichiro Kawachi; Emily H Marr; Eliza J Webber; Hyun H Seo; Scott I M Friedlander; Ruey-Kang R Chang Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Emily Finlayson; Shoujun Zhao; W John Boscardin; Brant E Fries; C Seth Landefeld; R Adams Dudley Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-03-16 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Karl Pillemer; Rhoda H Meador; Jeanne A Teresi; Emily K Chen; Charles R Henderson; Mark S Lachs; Gabriel Boratgis; Stephanie Silver; Joseph P Eimicke Journal: J Aging Health Date: 2011-06-06
Authors: Timo W Hakkarainen; Patricia Ayoung-Chee; Rafael Alfonso; Saman Arbabi; David R Flum Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2014-06-08 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Lucas W Thornblade; Saman Arbabi; David R Flum; Qian Qiu; Vanessa J Fawcett; Giana H Davidson Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2017-10-15 Impact factor: 4.669