Andrea Wysocki1, Kali S Thomas2, Vincent Mor2. 1. Mathematica Policy Research, Washington, DC. Electronic address: awysocki@mathematica-mpr.com. 2. School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence RI; Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the completeness of the activities of daily living (ADL) items on admission and discharge assessments and the improvement in ADL performance among short-stay residents in the newly adopted Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of MDS admission and discharge assessments. SETTING: Nursing homes from July 1, 2011, to June 30, 2012. PARTICIPANTS: New nursing home residents admitted from acute hospitals with corresponding admission and discharge assessments between July 1, 2011, and June 30, 2012, who had a length of stay of 100 days or less. MEASUREMENTS: ADL self-performance items, including bed mobility, transfer, walking in room, walking in corridor, locomotion on unit, locomotion off unit, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene, at admission and discharge. RESULTS: The ADL self-performance items are complete at both admission and discharge, with less than 1% missing for any item. More than 60% of residents improved over the course of their post-acute stay. New short-stay nursing home residents with conditions such as cognitive impairment, delirium, dementia, heart failure, and stroke showed less improvement in ADL performance during their stay. CONCLUSION: The discharge assessment data in the MDS 3.0 provide new information to researchers and providers to examine and track ADL performance. Nursing homes can identify and track patients who require more intensive therapies or targeted interventions to achieve functional improvement during their stay. Future research can examine facility-level measures to better understand how ADL improvement varies across facilities.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the completeness of the activities of daily living (ADL) items on admission and discharge assessments and the improvement in ADL performance among short-stay residents in the newly adopted Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of MDS admission and discharge assessments. SETTING: Nursing homes from July 1, 2011, to June 30, 2012. PARTICIPANTS: New nursing home residents admitted from acute hospitals with corresponding admission and discharge assessments between July 1, 2011, and June 30, 2012, who had a length of stay of 100 days or less. MEASUREMENTS: ADL self-performance items, including bed mobility, transfer, walking in room, walking in corridor, locomotion on unit, locomotion off unit, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene, at admission and discharge. RESULTS: The ADL self-performance items are complete at both admission and discharge, with less than 1% missing for any item. More than 60% of residents improved over the course of their post-acute stay. New short-stay nursing home residents with conditions such as cognitive impairment, delirium, dementia, heart failure, and stroke showed less improvement in ADL performance during their stay. CONCLUSION: The discharge assessment data in the MDS 3.0 provide new information to researchers and providers to examine and track ADL performance. Nursing homes can identify and track patients who require more intensive therapies or targeted interventions to achieve functional improvement during their stay. Future research can examine facility-level measures to better understand how ADL improvement varies across facilities.
Authors: Edward R Marcantonio; Dan K Kiely; Samuel E Simon; E John Orav; Richard N Jones; Katharine M Murphy; Margaret A Bergmann Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Edward R Marcantonio; Samuel E Simon; Margaret A Bergmann; Richard N Jones; Katharine M Murphy; John N Morris Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Dan K Kiely; Richard N Jones; Margaret A Bergmann; Katharine M Murphy; E John Orav; Edward R Marcantonio Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Kali S Thomas; Eric Boyd; Angela B Mariotto; Dolly C Penn; Michael J Barrett; Joan L Warren Journal: Med Care Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Shao-Hsien Liu; Jacob N Hunnicutt; Christine M Ulbricht; Catherine E Dubé; Anne L Hume; Kate L Lapane Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Adam Simning; Thomas V Caprio; Sarah L Szanton; Helena Temkin-Greener; Yeates Conwell Journal: Geriatr Nurs Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 2.361
Authors: Brian Downer; Kali S Thomas; Vincent Mor; James S Goodwin; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Tonya J Roberts; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; Maichou Lor; Daniel Liebzeit; Christopher J Crnich; Debra Saliba Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2017-08-23 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Kali S Thomas; Jessica A Ogarek; Joan M Teno; Pedro L Gozalo; Vincent Mor Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Danni Zhao; Divya Shridharmurthy; Matthew J Alcusky; Yiyang Yuan; Anthony P Nunes; Anne L Hume; Jonggyu Baek; Kate L Lapane Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Addie Middleton; Brian Downer; Allen Haas; Yu-Li Lin; James E Graham; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 4.669