Reem Hasan1, Donna D Baird, Amy H Herring, Andrew F Olshan, Michele L Jonsson Funk, Katherine E Hartmann. 1. From the Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; the Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and the Institute for Medicine and Public Health and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the strength of association between first-trimester bleeding and miscarriage, setting aside bleeding at time of loss. METHODS: Women enrolled in a community-based pregnancy cohort study before or during early pregnancy. Detailed first-trimester bleeding data were collected by telephone interview. Bleeding episodes proximal to miscarriage (within 4 days) were excluded. We used discrete-time hazard models to evaluate the association between bleeding and miscarriage. Models were adjusted for maternal age, prior miscarriage, and smoking. Exploratory regression tree analysis was used to evaluate the relative importance of other bleeding characteristics (duration, associated pain, color, timing). RESULTS: Of the 4,510 participants, 1,204 (27%) reported some first-trimester vaginal bleeding or spotting, and 517 miscarriages were observed. Eight percent of those with bleeding reported heavy bleeding episodes. When we evaluated any bleeding, including episodes of only spotting, the unadjusted relative odds ratio (OR) of miscarriage for women with bleeding (n=1,204) was 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-1.3). However, women who reported heavy bleeding (n=97) had nearly three times the risk of miscarriage compared with women without bleeding during the first trimester (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.9-4.6). Adjustment for covariates had little effect on estimates. Further analyses suggested that women with heavy bleeding accompanied by pain were the group accounting for most of the elevated risk. CONCLUSION: Heavy bleeding in the first trimester, particularly when accompanied by pain, is associated with higher risk of miscarriage. Spotting and light episodes are not, especially if lasting only 1-2 days. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the strength of association between first-trimester bleeding and miscarriage, setting aside bleeding at time of loss. METHODS: Women enrolled in a community-based pregnancy cohort study before or during early pregnancy. Detailed first-trimester bleeding data were collected by telephone interview. Bleeding episodes proximal to miscarriage (within 4 days) were excluded. We used discrete-time hazard models to evaluate the association between bleeding and miscarriage. Models were adjusted for maternal age, prior miscarriage, and smoking. Exploratory regression tree analysis was used to evaluate the relative importance of other bleeding characteristics (duration, associated pain, color, timing). RESULTS: Of the 4,510 participants, 1,204 (27%) reported some first-trimester vaginal bleeding or spotting, and 517 miscarriages were observed. Eight percent of those with bleeding reported heavy bleeding episodes. When we evaluated any bleeding, including episodes of only spotting, the unadjusted relative odds ratio (OR) of miscarriage for women with bleeding (n=1,204) was 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-1.3). However, women who reported heavy bleeding (n=97) had nearly three times the risk of miscarriage compared with women without bleeding during the first trimester (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.9-4.6). Adjustment for covariates had little effect on estimates. Further analyses suggested that women with heavy bleeding accompanied by pain were the group accounting for most of the elevated risk. CONCLUSION: Heavy bleeding in the first trimester, particularly when accompanied by pain, is associated with higher risk of miscarriage. Spotting and light episodes are not, especially if lasting only 1-2 days. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Authors: Joshua L Weiss; Fergal D Malone; John Vidaver; Robert H Ball; David A Nyberg; Christine H Comstock; Gary D Hankins; Richard L Berkowitz; Susan J Gross; Lorraine Dugoff; Ilan E Timor-Tritsch; Mary E D'Alton Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Caroline S Hoffman; Lynne C Messer; Pauline Mendola; David A Savitz; Amy H Herring; Katherine E Hartmann Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Reem Hasan; Donna D Baird; Amy H Herring; Andrew F Olshan; Michele L Jonsson Funk; Katherine E Hartmann Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Katherine J Sapra; K S Joseph; Sandro Galea; Lisa M Bates; Germaine M Buck Louis; Cande V Ananth Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 3.060
Authors: Sarah Horvath; Patricia Tsao; Zhen-Yu Huang; Ling Zhao; Yangzhu Du; Mary D Sammel; Eline T Luning Prak; Courtney A Schreiber Journal: Contraception Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Elizabeth A DeVilbiss; Ashley I Naimi; Sunni L Mumford; Neil J Perkins; Lindsey A Sjaarda; Jessica R Zolton; Robert M Silver; Enrique F Schisterman Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-04-10 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Reem Hasan; Michele L Jonsson Funk; Amy H Herring; Andrew F Olshan; Katherine E Hartmann; Donna D Baird Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Sudeshna Mukherjee; Digna R Velez Edwards; Donna D Baird; David A Savitz; Katherine E Hartmann Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Katherine J Sapra; Germaine M Buck Louis; Rajeshwari Sundaram; K S Joseph; Lisa M Bates; Sando Galea; Cande V Ananth Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2017-08-25 Impact factor: 3.980