Literature DB >> 14693410

Preference and resource utilization in elderly patients: InnoLet versus vial/syringe.

John Shelmet1, Sherwyn Schwartz, John Cappleman, Gregory Peterson, Soren Skovlund, Lene Lytzen, Lars Nicklasson, John Liang, William Lyness.   

Abstract

InnoLet is a disposable insulin injection device with a large easy-to-read dial, large push button for injection, and audible clicks for each unit injected. This clinical trial assessed patient preference, satisfaction, and utilization of healthcare resources (estimated nursing care) for InnoLet and vial/syringe. Patients with diabetes mellitus (N=79, mean age 68.2+/-8.6 years, duration of diabetes 16.5+/-10.9 years) having visual and/or motor disabilities and having difficulty (or required caregiver assistance) for previous injections by vial/syringe were randomized to use of either InnoLet or vial/syringe for 6 weeks, then switched to the alternate regimen for 6 weeks. At the end of the study, utilization of healthcare resources was assessed in terms of the caregiver time required to assist in preparation, storage, and disposal of each device. For vial/syringe, 60% of patients required assistance in drawing up the appropriate dosage in the syringe, and 36% of patients required assistance when injecting insulin. A major portion of the patients (53%) could independently conduct injections (without nursing/caregiver assistance) during use of InnoLet, versus 20% for vial/syringe. As a result, mean daily nursing costs associated with the injection regimen were US$ 114 for the InnoLet device, and US$ 196 for vial/syringe (P<0.001). A majority of patients (82%) indicated a preference for the InnoLet device (P<0.001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14693410     DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2003.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract        ISSN: 0168-8227            Impact factor:   5.602


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of a novel insulin bolus-patch with pen/syringe injection to deliver mealtime insulin for efficacy, preference, and quality of life in adults with diabetes: a randomized, crossover, multicenter study.

Authors:  Nancy Bohannon; Richard Bergenstal; Robert Cuddihy; Davida Kruger; Susan List; Elaine Massaro; Mark Molitch; Philip Raskin; Heather Remtema; Suzanne Strowig; Fred Whitehouse; Rocco L Brunelle; Darlene Dreon; Meng Tan
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 2.  Pen Devices for Insulin Self-Administration Compared With Needle and Vial: Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pieralessandro Lasalvia; Julián Esteban Barahona-Correa; Diana Marcela Romero-Alvernia; Sebastián Gil-Tamayo; Camilo Castañeda-Cardona; Juan Gabriel Bayona; Juan José Triana; Andrés Felipe Laserna; Miguel Mejía-Torres; Paula Restrepo-Jimenez; Juliana Jimenez-Zapata; Diego Rosselli
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-28

3.  An analysis of patient acceptance and safety of a prefilled insulin injection device.

Authors:  Lisa Kroon
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-11-01

4.  United States patient preference and usability for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus other disposable pens.

Authors:  Jerome S Fischer; Steven V Edelman; Sherwyn L Schwartz
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

5.  Vial-to-Pen: Community-Based Pharmacists Converting Insulin Regimens.

Authors:  Ashley N Hannings; Natasha M Michaels; Debbie Hiller; Macary Weck Marciniak; Stefanie P Ferreri
Journal:  Innov Pharm       Date:  2019-07-08

6.  A review of insulin pen devices and use in the elderly diabetic population.

Authors:  Bradley M Wright; Jessica M Bellone; Emily K McCoy
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2010-11-22

Review 7.  Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, values, preferences, and feasibility in relation to the use of injection safety devices in healthcare settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rami Tarabay; Rola El Rassi; Abeer Dakik; Alain Harb; Rami A Ballout; Batoul Diab; Selma Khamassi; Elie A Akl
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  A comparison study of patient ratings and safety of 32- and 34-gauge insulin pen needles.

Authors:  Satoru Yamada; Yoshifumi Yamada; Yoko Tsukamoto; Mitsuhisa Tabata; Junichiro Irie
Journal:  Diabetol Int       Date:  2015-10-28

9.  An evaluation of prefilled insulin pens: a focus on the Next Generation FlexPen(®).

Authors:  Estella M Davis; Emily L Sexson; Mikayla L Spangler; Pamela A Foral
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2010-08-26

Review 10.  A Systematic Review of Patients' Perspectives on the Subcutaneous Route of Medication Administration.

Authors:  Colin H Ridyard; Dalia M M Dawoud; Lorna V Tuersley; Dyfrig A Hughes
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.