Literature DB >> 19885266

An analysis: to code or not to code-that is the question.

Barry H Ginsberg1.   

Abstract

Most blood glucose monitoring systems need coding to correct for variation in lots of enzyme, which leads to differences in lots of strips. About 16% of patients miscode the meters, although the magnitude of the miscoding is unstudied. This miscoding has the potential to cause errors as high as 30% and to cause errors in adjusting insulin therapy that could lead to hypoglycemia at least 10% of the time. Studies of these systems suggest that they have accuracy similar to other current meters and have similar physical characteristics. Because they do not require coding, they are often easier to use. No-coding systems have the potential to avoid some errors in blood glucose.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; auto code; glucose; monitoring; no code

Year:  2008        PMID: 19885266      PMCID: PMC2769783          DOI: 10.1177/193229680800200511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  12 in total

1.  Standardized evaluation of instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose by patients and a technologist.

Authors:  Gunn B B Kristensen; Kari Nerhus; Geir Thue; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Benefits and limitations of self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-01

3.  Performance evaluation of a new blood glucose monitor that requires no coding: the OneTouch Vita System.

Authors:  Joanna K Young; John M Ellison; Robert Marshall
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-09

4.  Predicted blood glucose from insulin administration based on values from miscoded glucose meters.

Authors:  Charles H Raine; Scott Pardo; Joan Lee Parkes
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-07

5.  "No coding" of glucose test strips: a roche perspective.

Authors:  Matthias Essenpreis; Dirk Scherff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-07

6.  Miscoding and other user errors: importance of ongoing education for proper blood glucose monitoring procedures.

Authors:  Linda E Schrock
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-07

7.  Improving the quality of self-monitoring blood glucose measurement: a study in reducing calibration errors.

Authors:  John M Baum; Nanette M Monhaut; Donald R Parker; Christopher P Price
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  FreeStyle Lite--a blood glucose meter that requires no coding.

Authors:  Shridhara Alva
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-07

9.  Significant insulin dose errors may occur if blood glucose results are obtained from miscoded meters.

Authors:  Charles H Raine; Linda E Schrock; Steven V Edelman; Sunder Raj D Mudaliar; Weiping Zhong; Lois J Proud; Joan Lee Parkes
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-03

10.  Serum glucose determination with dextrostix and the eyetone reflectance meter.

Authors:  P Hornnes; C Kühl
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1976
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.