BACKGROUND: In silico testing was used extensively in the European Commission-funded Closed Loop Insulin Infusion for Critically Ill Patients (Clinicip) project, which aimed to develop prototype systems for closed loop glucose control in the critically ill. This article presents two examples of how the simulation environment was utilized in this project. METHODS: The in silico simulation environment was used to simulate a 48-hour clinical trial in a surgical intensive care unit to achieve tight glycemic control. A set of 10 critically ill synthetic subjects was selected for two different studies. In the first study, two sets of clinical trials were simulated using two versions of a model predictive control (MPC)-based glucose control algorithm: MPC Version 0.1.5 with hourly glucose measurements and updated MPC Version 1.4.3 with variable 1- to 4-hour glucose sampling. In the second study, four sets of clinical trials were simulated with four levels of measurement error at 2, 5, 7, and 15% coefficient of variation corresponding to the measurement error of commercially available glucose measuring devices. RESULTS: In the first study, more frequent glucose measurements associated with MPC Version 0.1.5 facilitated more efficacious and safer glucose control compared to that obtained with the prolonged and variable glucose sampling rate associated with MPC Version 1.4.3. In the second study, a marked deterioration in safety measures was observed in studies performed with a measurement error of 15%. CONCLUSIONS: The presented simulation studies highlighted two important uses of in silico simulation environment in the Clinicip project. The impressive progress and successful completion of the Clinicip project would not be possible without computer-based simulations.
BACKGROUND: In silico testing was used extensively in the European Commission-funded Closed Loop Insulin Infusion for Critically IllPatients (Clinicip) project, which aimed to develop prototype systems for closed loop glucose control in the critically ill. This article presents two examples of how the simulation environment was utilized in this project. METHODS: The in silico simulation environment was used to simulate a 48-hour clinical trial in a surgical intensive care unit to achieve tight glycemic control. A set of 10 critically ill synthetic subjects was selected for two different studies. In the first study, two sets of clinical trials were simulated using two versions of a model predictive control (MPC)-based glucose control algorithm: MPC Version 0.1.5 with hourly glucose measurements and updated MPC Version 1.4.3 with variable 1- to 4-hour glucose sampling. In the second study, four sets of clinical trials were simulated with four levels of measurement error at 2, 5, 7, and 15% coefficient of variation corresponding to the measurement error of commercially available glucose measuring devices. RESULTS: In the first study, more frequent glucose measurements associated with MPC Version 0.1.5 facilitated more efficacious and safer glucose control compared to that obtained with the prolonged and variable glucose sampling rate associated with MPC Version 1.4.3. In the second study, a marked deterioration in safety measures was observed in studies performed with a measurement error of 15%. CONCLUSIONS: The presented simulation studies highlighted two important uses of in silico simulation environment in the Clinicip project. The impressive progress and successful completion of the Clinicip project would not be possible without computer-based simulations.
Authors: G van den Berghe; P Wouters; F Weekers; C Verwaest; F Bruyninckx; M Schetz; D Vlasselaers; P Ferdinande; P Lauwers; R Bouillon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-11-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Greet Van den Berghe; Alexander Wilmer; Greet Hermans; Wouter Meersseman; Pieter J Wouters; Ilse Milants; Eric Van Wijngaerden; Herman Bobbaers; Roger Bouillon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-02-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Timothy Lonergan; Aaron Le Compte; Mike Willacy; J Geoffrey Chase; Geoffrey M Shaw; Xing-Wei Wong; Thomas Lotz; Jessica Lin; Christopher E Hann Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Johannes Plank; Jan Blaha; Jeremy Cordingley; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Ludovic J Chassin; Cliff Morgan; Stephen Squire; Martin Haluzik; Jaromir Kremen; Stepan Svacina; Wolfgang Toller; Andreas Plasnik; Martin Ellmerer; Roman Hovorka; Thomas R Pieber Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Philip A Goldberg; Mark D Siegel; Robert S Sherwin; Joshua I Halickman; Michelle Lee; Valerie A Bailey; Sandy L Lee; James D Dziura; Silvio E Inzucchi Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Frank M Brunkhorst; Christoph Engel; Frank Bloos; Andreas Meier-Hellmann; Max Ragaller; Norbert Weiler; Onnen Moerer; Matthias Gruendling; Michael Oppert; Stefan Grond; Derk Olthoff; Ulrich Jaschinski; Stefan John; Rolf Rossaint; Tobias Welte; Martin Schaefer; Peter Kern; Evelyn Kuhnt; Michael Kiehntopf; Christiane Hartog; Charles Natanson; Markus Loeffler; Konrad Reinhart Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-01-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Claudio Cobelli; Chiara Dalla Man; Giovanni Sparacino; Lalo Magni; Giuseppe De Nicolao; Boris P Kovatchev Journal: IEEE Rev Biomed Eng Date: 2009-01-01
Authors: Joseph El Youssef; Jessica R Castle; Deborah L Branigan; Ryan G Massoud; Matthew E Breen; Peter G Jacobs; B Wayne Bequette; W Kenneth Ward Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2011-11-01
Authors: Malgorzata E Wilinska; Ludovic J Chassin; Carlo L Acerini; Janet M Allen; David B Dunger; Roman Hovorka Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2010-01-01
Authors: J Geoffrey Chase; Aaron LeCompte; Geoffrey M Shaw; Amy Blakemore; Jason Wong; Jessica Lin; Christopher E Hann Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2008-07
Authors: J Geoffrey Chase; Fatanah Suhaimi; Sophie Penning; Jean-Charles Preiser; Aaron J Le Compte; Jessica Lin; Christopher G Pretty; Geoffrey M Shaw; Katherine T Moorhead; Thomas Desaive Journal: Biomed Eng Online Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 2.819
Authors: J Geoffrey Chase; Aaron J Le Compte; J-C Preiser; Geoffrey M Shaw; Sophie Penning; Thomas Desaive Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2011-05-05 Impact factor: 6.925
Authors: J Geoffrey Chase; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jennifer L Dickson; Antoine Pironet; Yeong Shiong Chiew; Christopher G Pretty; Geoffrey M Shaw; Balazs Benyo; Knut Moeller; Soroush Safaei; Merryn Tawhai; Peter Hunter; Thomas Desaive Journal: Biomed Eng Online Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 2.819