PURPOSE: As a result of the questionable risk-to-benefit ratio of adjuvant therapies, stage II melanoma is currently managed by observation because available clinicopathologic parameters cannot identify the 20% to 60% of such patients likely to develop metastatic disease. Here, we propose a multimarker molecular prognostic assay that can help triage patients at increased risk of recurrence. METHODS: Protein expression for 38 candidates relevant to melanoma oncogenesis was evaluated using the automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) method for immunofluorescence-based immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens from a cohort of 192 primary melanomas collected during 1959 to 1994. The prognostic assay was built using a genetic algorithm and validated on an independent cohort of 246 serial primary melanomas collected from 1997 to 2004. RESULTS: Multiple iterations of the genetic algorithm yielded a consistent five-marker solution. A favorable prognosis was predicted by ATF2 ln(non-nuclear/nuclear AQUA score ratio) of more than -0.052, p21(WAF1) nuclear compartment AQUA score of more than 12.98, p16(INK4A) ln(non-nuclear/nuclear AQUA score ratio) of < or = -0.083, beta-catenin total AQUA score of more than 38.68, and fibronectin total AQUA score of < or = 57.93. Primary tumors that met at least four of these five conditions were considered a low-risk group, and those that met three or fewer conditions formed a high-risk group (log-rank P < .0001). Multivariable proportional hazards analysis adjusting for clinicopathologic parameters shows that the high-risk group has significantly reduced survival on both the discovery (hazard ratio = 2.84; 95% CI, 1.46 to 5.49; P = .002) and validation (hazard ratio = 2.72; 95% CI, 1.12 to 6.58; P = .027) cohorts. CONCLUSION: This multimarker prognostic assay, an independent determinant of melanoma survival, might be beneficial in improving the selection of stage II patients for adjuvant therapy.
PURPOSE: As a result of the questionable risk-to-benefit ratio of adjuvant therapies, stage II melanoma is currently managed by observation because available clinicopathologic parameters cannot identify the 20% to 60% of such patients likely to develop metastatic disease. Here, we propose a multimarker molecular prognostic assay that can help triage patients at increased risk of recurrence. METHODS: Protein expression for 38 candidates relevant to melanoma oncogenesis was evaluated using the automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) method for immunofluorescence-based immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens from a cohort of 192 primary melanomas collected during 1959 to 1994. The prognostic assay was built using a genetic algorithm and validated on an independent cohort of 246 serial primary melanomas collected from 1997 to 2004. RESULTS: Multiple iterations of the genetic algorithm yielded a consistent five-marker solution. A favorable prognosis was predicted by ATF2 ln(non-nuclear/nuclear AQUA score ratio) of more than -0.052, p21(WAF1) nuclear compartment AQUA score of more than 12.98, p16(INK4A) ln(non-nuclear/nuclear AQUA score ratio) of < or = -0.083, beta-catenin total AQUA score of more than 38.68, and fibronectin total AQUA score of < or = 57.93. Primary tumors that met at least four of these five conditions were considered a low-risk group, and those that met three or fewer conditions formed a high-risk group (log-rank P < .0001). Multivariable proportional hazards analysis adjusting for clinicopathologic parameters shows that the high-risk group has significantly reduced survival on both the discovery (hazard ratio = 2.84; 95% CI, 1.46 to 5.49; P = .002) and validation (hazard ratio = 2.72; 95% CI, 1.12 to 6.58; P = .027) cohorts. CONCLUSION: This multimarker prognostic assay, an independent determinant of melanoma survival, might be beneficial in improving the selection of stage II patients for adjuvant therapy.
Authors: Ingeborg M Bachmann; Oddbjørn Straume; Hanne E Puntervoll; May Britt Kalvenes; Lars A Akslen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Phyllis A Gimotty; Patricia Van Belle; David E Elder; Todd Murry; Kathleen T Montone; Xiaowei Xu; Susan Hotz; Shane Raines; Michael E Ming; Peter Wahl; Dupont Guerry Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Véronique Winnepenninckx; Vladimir Lazar; Stefan Michiels; Philippe Dessen; Marguerite Stas; Soledad R Alonso; Marie-Françoise Avril; Pablo L Ortiz Romero; Thomas Robert; Ovidiu Balacescu; Alexander M M Eggermont; Gilbert Lenoir; Alain Sarasin; Thomas Tursz; Joost J van den Oord; Alain Spatz Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-04-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Marc D Pacifico; Rajiv Grover; Paul I Richman; Frances M Daley; Francesca Buffa; George D Wilson Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Lisa M McShane; Douglas G Altman; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube; Massimo Gion; Gary M Clark Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2005-08-17 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Han Liu; Xuehong Deng; Y John Shyu; Jian Jian Li; Elizabeth J Taparowsky; Chang-Deng Hu Journal: EMBO J Date: 2006-03-02 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Andrew M Waters; Irem Ozkan-Dagliyan; Angelina V Vaseva; Nicole Fer; Leslie A Strathern; G Aaron Hobbs; Basile Tessier-Cloutier; William K Gillette; Rachel Bagni; Gordon R Whiteley; James L Hartley; Frank McCormick; Adrienne D Cox; Peter J Houghton; David G Huntsman; Mark R Philips; Channing J Der Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2017-09-26 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Kenneth L Scott; Cristina Nogueira; Timothy P Heffernan; Remco van Doorn; Sabin Dhakal; Jason A Hanna; Chengyin Min; Mariela Jaskelioff; Yonghong Xiao; Chang-Jiun Wu; Lisa A Cameron; Samuel R Perry; Rhamy Zeid; Tamar Feinberg; Minjung Kim; George Vande Woude; Scott R Granter; Marcus Bosenberg; Gerald C Chu; Ronald A DePinho; David L Rimm; Lynda Chin Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2011-07-12 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Jacob S Ankeny; Brian Labadie; Jason Luke; Eddy Hsueh; Jane Messina; Jonathan S Zager Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Tal Varsano; Eric Lau; Yongmei Feng; Marine Garrido; Loribelle Milan; Susanne Heynen-Genel; Christian A Hassig; Ze'ev A Ronai Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Lindsay Hollander; Xiaojia Guo; Heino Velazquez; John Chang; Robert Safirstein; Harriet Kluger; Charles Cha; Gary V Desir Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Hollis Viray; William R Bradley; Kurt A Schalper; David L Rimm; Bonnie E Gould Rothberg Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 5.534