| Literature DB >> 28951536 |
Andrew M Waters1,2, Irem Ozkan-Dagliyan3, Angelina V Vaseva1,4, Nicole Fer2, Leslie A Strathern2, G Aaron Hobbs1, Basile Tessier-Cloutier5, William K Gillette2, Rachel Bagni2, Gordon R Whiteley2, James L Hartley2, Frank McCormick2,6, Adrienne D Cox1,3,7, Peter J Houghton4, David G Huntsman5, Mark R Philips8, Channing J Der9,3.
Abstract
There is intense interest in developing therapeutic strategies for RAS proteins, the most frequently mutated oncoprotein family in cancer. Development of effective anti-RAS therapies will be aided by the greater appreciation of RAS isoform-specific differences in signaling events that support neoplastic cell growth. However, critical issues that require resolution to facilitate the success of these efforts remain. In particular, the use of well-validated anti-RAS antibodies is essential for accurate interpretation of experimental data. We evaluated 22 commercially available anti-RAS antibodies with a set of distinct reagents and cell lines for their specificity and selectivity in recognizing the intended RAS isoforms and mutants. Reliability varied substantially. For example, we found that some pan- or isoform-selective anti-RAS antibodies did not adequately recognize their intended target or showed greater selectivity for another; some were valid for detecting G12D and G12V mutant RAS proteins in Western blotting, but none were valid for immunofluorescence or immunohistochemical analyses; and some antibodies recognized nonspecific bands in lysates from "Rasless" cells expressing the oncoprotein BRAFV600E Using our validated antibodies, we identified RAS isoform-specific siRNAs and shRNAs. Our results may help to ensure the accurate interpretation of future RAS studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28951536 PMCID: PMC5812265 DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aao3332
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Signal ISSN: 1945-0877 Impact factor: 8.192