Literature DB >> 1988281

Chromosome topology in mammalian interphase nuclei.

T Haaf1, M Schmid.   

Abstract

Since 1968, when Comings published the pioneering paper on "the rationale for an ordered arrangement of chromatin in the interphase nucleus," technical methods have progressed tremendously and improved our understanding of interphase organization. The existence of highly ordered organizational patterns of the cell nucleus appears to be beyond any doubt and it is difficult to escape the conclusion that interphase chromosome topology is important for the complex regulation of the many varied and interrelated nuclear processes. However, it is worth emphasizing that a universally valid principle of chromosome arrangement does not exist and, therefore, any generalization of interphase patterns can be misleading. The factors of order according to which the chromosomes are arranged inside the nucleus are manifold: (1) Individual chromosomes remain in spatially separated domains throughout interphase, preventing an intermingling of the decondensed euchromatin. (2) Chromosome regions that contain constitutive heterochromatin associate into larger chromocenters. (3) In most cell types direct associations between interphase domains of homologous chromosomes are not observed. In others homologous heterochromatic regions tend to be paired preferentially. (4) Interphase chromosomes do not float freely in the nucleoplasm; they are associated to varying degrees with the nuclear membrane and other components of the nuclear scaffold. The number of attachment sites for each chromosome to the nuclear membrane is relatively low. (5) The positions of centromeres (and pericentromeric heterochromatin) are nonrandom and characteristic of each cell type. Specific centromere movements occur during the cell cycle, during differentiation, and under certain pathophysiological conditions. (6) The telomeric chromosome ends are particularly prone to associate in certain somatic cell types and in meiotic prophase cells. (7) The arrangement of repetitive DNA families appears to determine a structural framework of the interphase nucleus. Different cell types of one organism can exhibit marked differences in their repetitive DNA framework, whereas cells that are in an identical differentiated state or an identical phase of the cell cycle often show comparable interphase patterns even in evolutionarily distant species. (8) The various steps of ribosome biogenesis take place in a precise fashion within a separate nuclear domain, the nucleolus. The topologically well-defined nucleolar substructures are required for rDNA transcription and pre-rRNA processing. (9) A compartmentalization of transcriptional and processing events is also evident in the rest of the nucleus. However, it is not yet known if the in situ sites of transcription and RNA processing for a particular (nonribosomal) gene or gene family are actually adjacent. (10) DNA replication is precisely spatiotemporally regulated within the nucleus. The replication domains are immobilized on the nuclear matrix.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1988281     DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(91)90048-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Cell Res        ISSN: 0014-4827            Impact factor:   3.905


  52 in total

1.  Size-dependent positioning of human chromosomes in interphase nuclei.

Authors:  H B Sun; J Shen; H Yokota
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Chromosomal G-dark bands determine the spatial organization of centromeric heterochromatin in the nucleus.

Authors:  C Carvalho; H M Pereira; J Ferreira; C Pina; D Mendonça; A C Rosa; M Carmo-Fonseca
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.138

3.  Chromosomal painting detects non-random chromosome arrangement in dasyurid marsupial sperm.

Authors:  I K Greaves; M Svartman; M Wakefield; D Taggart; A De Leo; M A Ferguson-Smith; W Rens; P C O'Brien; L Voullaire; M Westerman; J A Graves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Cytogenetic and immuno-FISH analysis of the 4q subtelomeric region, which is associated with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Chunbo Shao; Vettaikorumakankav Vedanarayanan; Melanie Ehrlich
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Differences in centromere positioning of cycling and postmitotic human cell types.

Authors:  Irina Solovei; Lothar Schermelleh; Klaus Düring; Andrea Engelhardt; Stefan Stein; Christoph Cremer; Thomas Cremer
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 6.  Formation of nuclear heterochromatin: the nucleolar point of view.

Authors:  Claudio Guetg; Raffaella Santoro
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 7.  Nucleolar DNA: the host and the guests.

Authors:  E Smirnov; D Cmarko; T Mazel; M Hornáček; I Raška
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.304

8.  Three-dimensional architecture of tandem repeats in chicken interphase nucleus.

Authors:  Antonina Maslova; Anna Zlotina; Nadezhda Kosyakova; Marina Sidorova; Alla Krasikova
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Epigenomic differentiation in mouse preimplantation nuclei of biparental, parthenote and cloned embryos.

Authors:  Valeria Merico; Jessica Barbieri; Maurizio Zuccotti; Boris Joffe; Thomas Cremer; Carlo Alberto Redi; Irina Solovei; Silvia Garagna
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Nuclear organization of centromeric domains is not perturbed by inhibition of histone deacetylases.

Authors:  Susan Gilchrist; Nick Gilbert; Paul Perry; Wendy A Bickmore
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.