Literature DB >> 19882179

Accuracy of free-hand placement of thoracic pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how much of a difference does surgeon experience make?

Amer F Samdani1, Ashish Ranade, Daniel M Sciubba, Patrick J Cahill, M Darryl Antonacci, David H Clements, Randal R Betz.   

Abstract

The use of thoracic pedicle screws for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has gained widespread popularity. However, the placement of pedicle screws in the deformed spine poses unique challenges, and surgeons experience a learning curve. The in vivo accuracy as determined by computed tomography (CT) of placement of thoracic pedicle screws in the deformed spine as a function of surgeon experience is unknown. We undertook a retrospective review to determine the effect of surgeon experience on the accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement in AIS. In 2005, we started to obtain routine postoperative CT scans on patients undergoing a spinal fusion. From a database of these patients, we selected AIS patients, who underwent a posterior spinal fusion. Fifteen consecutive patients for each of the following three groups stratified by attending surgeon experience were selected (N = 45): A) less than 20 cases of all pedicle screw constructs for AIS (surgeons <2 years of practice), B) 20-50 cases (surgeons 2-5 years of practice), and C) greater than 50 cases (surgeons greater than 5 years of practice). Intraoperative evaluation of all screws included probing of the pedicle screw tract, neurophysiologic monitoring, and fluoroscopic confirmation. A total of 856 thoracic pedicle screws were studied. Postoperative CT scans were evaluated by two spine surgeons and a consensus read established as follows: (1) In: intraosseous placement or <or=2-mm breach, (2) Out: >2-mm breach, either medial or lateral. Of the 856 screws, 104 demonstrated a >2-mm breach, for an overall rate of 12.1% (medial = 55, lateral = 49, P = 0.67). When the breach rates were stratified by surgeon experience, there was a trend toward decreased rate of breach for the most experienced surgeons, although this did not attain statistical significance (Group A: 12.7%, Group B: 12.9%, Group C: 10.8%, P = 0.58). However, the most experienced group (C) had a markedly decreased rate of medial breaches (3.5 vs. 7.4% and 8.4% for groups A and B, respectively, P < 0.01). The breach rate for the concave periapical screws was not statistically different from the overall breach rate (13.0% vs. 12.1%, P = 0.93). In conclusion, the overall accuracy of placement of pedicle screws in the deformed spine was 87.9%, with no neurologic, vascular, or visceral complications. Meticulous technique allows spine surgeons with a range of surgical experience to accurately and safely place thoracic pedicle screws in the deformed spine. The most experienced surgeons demonstrated the lowest rate of medial breaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19882179      PMCID: PMC2899745          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1183-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  32 in total

1.  Accuracy and safety of thoracic pedicle screw placement in spinal deformities.

Authors:  Yossi Smorgick; Michael A Millgram; Yoram Anekstein; Yizhar Floman; Yigal Mirovsky
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-12

2.  Stepwise methodology for plain radiographic assessment of pedicle screw placement: a comparison with computed tomography.

Authors:  Theodore J Choma; Francis Denis; John E Lonstein; Joseph H Perra; James D Schwender; Timothy A Garvey; William J Mullin
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2006-12

3.  Pedicle morphology of the thoracic spine in preadolescent idiopathic scoliosis: magnetic resonance supported analysis.

Authors:  Hüseyin Catan; Levent Buluç; Yonca Anik; Erhan Ayyildiz; Ahmet Yilmaz Sarlak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries.

Authors:  S Rajasekaran; S Vidyadhara; Perumal Ramesh; Ajoy P Shetty
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: An anatomical and radiographic assessment.

Authors:  A R Vaccaro; S J Rizzolo; R A Balderston; T J Allardyce; S R Garfin; C Dolinskas; H S An
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Evaluation of pedicle screw placement in the deformed spine using intraoperative plain radiographs: a comparison with computerized tomography.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Lawrence G Lenke; Gene Cheh; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in the elderly surgeon and hospital volume-related outcomes.

Authors:  Steven N Shah; Reid M Wainess; Madhav A Karunakar
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Lawrence G Lenke; Junghoon Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Samuel K Cho; Gene Cheh; Brenda Sides
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Surgical revision rates of hooks versus hybrid versus screws versus combined anteroposterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Timothy R Kuklo; Benjamin K Potter; Lawrence G Lenke; David W Polly; Brenda Sides; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Orthopaedic procedure volume and patient outcomes: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Nina Shervin; Harry E Rubash; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  27 in total

1.  Are computer numerical control (CNC)-manufactured patient-specific metal templates available for posterior thoracic pedicle screw insertion? Feasibility and accuracy evaluation.

Authors:  Xiangxue Kong; Lei Tang; Qiang Ye; Wenhua Huang; Jianyi Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Preliminary application of a multi-level 3D printing drill guide template for pedicle screw placement in severe and rigid scoliosis.

Authors:  Kun Liu; Qiang Zhang; Xin Li; Changsong Zhao; Xuemin Quan; Rugang Zhao; Zongfeng Chen; Yansheng Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Morphologic evaluation of the thoracic vertebrae for safe free-hand pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a CT-based anatomical study.

Authors:  Guanyu Cui; Kota Watanabe; Naobumi Hosogane; Takashi Tsuji; Ken Ishii; Masaya Nakamura; Yoshiaki Toyama; Kazuhiro Chiba; Lawrence G Lenke; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Are pedicle screw perforation rates influenced by registered or unregistered vertebrae in multilevel registration using a CT-based navigation system in the setting of scoliosis?

Authors:  Masayuki Shimizu; Jun Takahashi; Shota Ikegami; Shugo Kuraishi; Toshimasa Futatsugi; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  How is the trachea at risk of injury from pedicle screw insertion in proximal thoracic curve of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients?

Authors:  Bangping Qian; Jun Jiang; Feng Zhu; Zezhang Zhu; Zhen Liu; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Intraoperative Computed Tomography-Guided Navigation for Pediatric Spine Patients Reduced Return to Operating Room for Screw Malposition Compared With Freehand/Fluoroscopic Techniques.

Authors:  Fady J Baky; Todd Milbrandt; Scott Echternacht; Anthony A Stans; William J Shaughnessy; A Noelle Larson
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2019-07

7.  Learning curve for vertebral body tethering: analysis on 90 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Alice Baroncini; Per David Trobisch; Filippo Migliorini
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-08-21

8.  Photoacoustic imaging of a human vertebra: implications for guiding spinal fusion surgeries.

Authors:  Joshua Shubert; Muyinatu A Lediju Bell
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Observations on Surgeons' Case Selection, Morbidity, and Mortality Following Board Certification.

Authors:  Christopher A Guidry; Timothy E Newhook; Florence E Turrentine; Min-Woong Sohn; Robert G Sawyer; R Scott Jones
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Zonal differences in risk and pattern of pedicle screw perforations in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): a computerized tomography (CT) review of 1986 screws.

Authors:  C Y W Chan; M K Kwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.