Literature DB >> 19865546

Canadian experience with percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair: short-term outcomes.

S Marlene Grenon1, Joel Gagnon, York N Hsiang, Jerry C Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To decrease the morbidity associated with cut-downs during endovascular aneurysm repair, some authors have suggested the totally percutaneous endovascular repair (PEVAR). The goal of this report is to evaluate and describe our centre's experience with the total percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair (PEVAR) for aortic abdominal aneurysm (AAA).
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 15 consecutive patients with AAA, including 1 with right common iliac artery aneurysm.
RESULTS: There were 12 men and 3 women with a mean age of 74 (standard deviation [SD] 2) years who underwent PEVAR with a Perclose ProGlide suture-mediated closure system between July 2007 and July 2008. All surgeries were elective. Forty percent of patients had a history of smoking, 73% were hypertensive, 33% were diabetic, 20% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 40% had coronary artery disease. Fourteen patients had bilateral deployment for bifurcated devices (7 bifurcated Gore Excluder, 7 bifurcated Cook Zenith grafts), and 1 patient had unilateral deployment for a Cook Zenith device. The outer diameter of the sheaths used for puncture sites was on average 18.1-Fr (SD 0.6), with main bodies being 21.1-Fr (SD 0.3) and contralateral sides 15-Fr (SD 0.3). Procedural success was 93%, with 1 patient requiring a femoral artery cut-down because of failure of the Perclose device to deploy in the groin. Another patient had persistent venous bleeding in 1 puncture site that stopped with skin suturing. Endovascular aneurysm repair was 100% with no conversion to open surgery and no type-I endoleaks. The mean length of stay in hospital was 2.2 (SD 0.4) days. There were no long-term groin complications at 6 (SD 1) months' follow-up.
CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first Canadian report of experience with PEVAR using the Perclose device. The technique is safe, reliable and allows discharge of patients soon after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19865546      PMCID: PMC2769107     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  15 in total

1.  Closure of large percutaneous access sites using the Prostar XL Percutaneous Vascular Surgery device.

Authors:  P C Haas; Z Krajcer; E B Diethrich
Journal:  J Endovasc Surg       Date:  1999-05

2.  Total percutaneous access for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair ("Preclose" technique).

Authors:  W Anthony Lee; Michael P Brown; Peter R Nelson; Thomas S Huber
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Percutaneous access and closure of femoral artery access sites associated with endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  M Howell; R Villareal; Z Krajcer
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 4.  Percutaneous thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Melissa E Hogg; Melina R Kibbe
Journal:  Vascular       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.285

5.  Percutaneous repair of aortic aneurysms: a prospective study of suture-mediated closure devices.

Authors:  J Watelet; J-C Gallot; P Thomas; F Douvrin; D Plissonnier
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 7.069

6.  Endovascular suture versus cutdown for endovascular aneurysm repair: a prospective randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Giovanni B Torsello; Bernd Kasprzak; Eckhard Klenk; Jörg Tessarek; Nani Osada; Giovanni F Torsello
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Endovascular repair reduces early and late morbidity compared to open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Frank R Arko; Bradley B Hill; Cornelius Olcott; E John Harris; Thomas J Fogarty; Christopher K Zarins
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.487

8.  Totally percutaneous aortic aneurysm repair: experience and prudence.

Authors:  Benjamin Ware Starnes; Charles A Andersen; Joseph A Ronsivalle; Neal R Stockmaster; Philip S Mullenix; John D Statler
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Percutaneous repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Mark D Morasch; Melina R Kibbe; Mary E Evans; Wendy S Meadows; Mark K Eskandari; Jon S Matsumura; William H Pearce
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  J C Parodi; J C Palmaz; H D Barone
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.466

View more
  3 in total

1.  Totally percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: 30-day results from the independent access-site closure study of the PEVAR trial.

Authors:  Zvonimir Krajcer; Jesus M Matos
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Fascia Suture Technique and Suture-mediated Closure Devices: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Georgios Karaolanis; Ioannis D Kostakis; Demetrios Moris; Viktoria-Varvara Palla; Konstantinos G Moulakakis
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2018-01-22

3.  Predictors and treatments of Proglide-related complications in percutaneous endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Guohua Hu; Bin Chen; Weiguo Fu; Xin Xu; Daqiao Guo; Junhao Jiang; Jue Yang; Yuqi Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.