Literature DB >> 12844093

Endovascular suture versus cutdown for endovascular aneurysm repair: a prospective randomized pilot study.

Giovanni B Torsello1, Bernd Kasprzak, Eckhard Klenk, Jörg Tessarek, Nani Osada, Giovanni F Torsello.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and cost benefits of the percutaneous technique for treatment of aortic aneurysm, a prospective randomized study was performed that compared the endovascular suture technique with conventional cutdown access and repair.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2002 through July 2002, 30 endografts, including 14 Talent stent-grafts (Medtronic, Sunrise, Fla) and 16 Zenith endografts (Cook, Bloomington, Ind) were implanted in 30 patients for endovascular aneurysm treatment. The patients were randomized to either percutaneous technique (group A) or conventional cutdown (group B). Fifty-five femoral arteries were cannulated with large-bore (14F-25F) introducers and were included in the study. Safety and efficiency of both techniques were assessed by recording the complication rates, operation time, discharge, and time to ambulation. Comparison of selected estimated costs included both variable and fixed costs for femoral access and expenses for treatment of complications.
RESULTS: No operative deaths occurred. The complication rates were similar and included 1 arterial thrombosis in each group, 3 lymphoceles in group B, and 1 conversion to cutdown because of bleeding in group A. Mean surgery time (86.7 +/- 27 minutes vs 107.8 +/- 38.5 minutes; P <.05) and time to ambulation (20.1 +/- 4.3 hours vs 33.1 +/- 18.4 hours; P <.001) were significantly shorter in the group treated percutaneously. Because of the cost of the closure device, total cost of the percutaneous technique averaged 99.2 euro; more than cutdown.
CONCLUSIONS: The percutaneous technique decreases the invasiveness of endovascular therapy of aortic aneurysm and reduces operative time and time to ambulation. Complications were roughly equivalent in severity. The additional cost for the device appears to justify its use for this form of aneurysm treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12844093     DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(02)75454-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  21 in total

1.  Current status of percutaneous endografting.

Authors:  Bulent Arslan; Ulku C Turba; Saher Sabri; J Fritz Angle; Alan H Matsumoto
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Local Anesthesia for Percutaneous Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Authors:  Martijn van Dorp; Martijn Gilbers; Patrick Lauwers; Paul E Van Schil; Jeroen M H Hendriks
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2016-06-01

3.  Ultrasound-guided percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair success is predicted by access vessel diameter.

Authors:  Rodney P Bensley; Rob Hurks; Zhen Huang; Frank Pomposelli; Allen Hamdan; Mark Wyers; Elliot Chaikof; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 4.  Maintaining a minimally invasive approach-vascular closure after trans-catheter aortic valve intervention.

Authors:  James Cockburn; Adam de Belder; Mike Lewis; Uday Trivedi; David Hildick-Smith
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  A single-centre experience of 200 consecutive unselected patients in percutaneous EVAR.

Authors:  Sergio Petronelli; Maria Teresa Zurlo; Silvia Giambersio; Lucia Danieli; Mariaelena Occhipinti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Percutaneous versus femoral cutdown access for endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Dominique B Buck; Eleonora G Karthaus; Peter A Soden; Klaas H J Ultee; Joost A van Herwaarden; Frans L Moll; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 7.  Totally percutaneous versus surgical cut-down femoral artery access for elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Madelaine Gimzewska; Alexander Ir Jackson; Su Ern Yeoh; Mike Clarke
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-21

Review 8.  Current Status of Percutaneous Endografting.

Authors:  Parag J Patel; Quinton Kelly; Robert A Hieb; Cheong Jun Lee
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.513

9.  Canadian experience with percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair: short-term outcomes.

Authors:  S Marlene Grenon; Joel Gagnon; York N Hsiang; Jerry C Chen
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 10.  Fascia Suture Technique and Suture-mediated Closure Devices: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Georgios Karaolanis; Ioannis D Kostakis; Demetrios Moris; Viktoria-Varvara Palla; Konstantinos G Moulakakis
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2018-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.