| Literature DB >> 19864698 |
S Vauclin1, K Doyeux, S Hapdey, A Edet-Sanson, P Vera, I Gardin.
Abstract
An iterative generic algorithm has been developed to compare three thresholding models used to delineate gross tumour volume on (18)F-FDG PET images. 3D volume was extracted and characteristic parameters were measured. Three fitting models using different parameters were studied: model 1 (volume, contrast), model 2 (contrast) and model 3 (SUV). The calibration was performed using a cylindrical phantom filled with hot spheres. To validate the models, two other phantoms were used. The calibration procedure showed a better fitting model for model 1 (R(2) from 0.94 to 1.00) than for model 3 (0.95) and model 2 (0.69). The validation study shows that model 3 yielded large volume measurement errors. Models 1 and 2 gave close results with no significant differences. Model 2 was preferred because it presents less error dispersion and needs fewer characteristic parameters, making it easier to implement. Our results show the importance of developing a generic algorithm to compare the performances of fitting models objectively and to validate results on other phantoms than the ones used during the calibration process to avoid methodological biases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19864698 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/22/010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Phys Med Biol ISSN: 0031-9155 Impact factor: 3.609