Literature DB >> 19864282

Sexual conflict inhibits female mate choice for major histocompatibility complex dissimilarity in Chinook salmon.

Shawn R Garner1, Romina N Bortoluzzi, Daniel D Heath, Bryan D Neff.   

Abstract

In many species females prefer major histocompatibility complex (MHC) dissimilar mates, which may improve offspring resistance to pathogens. However, sexual conflict may interfere with female preference when males attempt to mate with all females, regardless of compatibility. Here we used semi-natural spawning channels to examine how mating behaviour and genetic similarity at the MHC class II peptide binding region affected parentage patterns in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). We found that females directed aggression at more MHC-similar males than expected by chance, providing a possible mechanism of female MHC choice in salmon. Males also directed aggression towards MHC-similar females, which was consistent with males harassing unreceptive mates. Males' aggression was positively correlated with their reproductive success, and it appeared to overcome female aversion to mating with MHC-similar males, as females who were the target of high levels of male aggression had lower than expected MHC divergence in their offspring. Indeed, offspring MHC divergence was highest when the sex ratio was female-biased and male harassment was likely to be less intense. These data suggest that male harassment can reduce female effectiveness in selecting MHC-compatible mates, and sexual conflict can thus have an indirect cost to females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19864282      PMCID: PMC2842720          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  36 in total

1.  Operational sex ratio influences female preference and male-male competition in guppies.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Parasite selection for immunogenetic optimality.

Authors:  K Mathias Wegner; Martin Kalbe; Joachim Kurtz; Thorsten B H Reusch; Manfred Milinski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  MHC and kin discrimination in juvenile Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L.).

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 4.  Ancestral polymorphisms of MHC class II genes: divergent allele advantage.

Authors:  E K Wakeland; S Boehme; J X She; C C Lu; R A McIndoe; I Cheng; Y Ye; W K Potts
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.829

5.  A hypothetical model of the foreign antigen binding site of class II histocompatibility molecules.

Authors:  J H Brown; T Jardetzky; M A Saper; B Samraoui; P J Bjorkman; D C Wiley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-04-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  MHC class IIB alleles contribute to both additive and nonadditive genetic effects on survival in Chinook salmon.

Authors:  Trevor E Pitcher; Bryan D Neff
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Influence of genetic dissimilarity in the reproductive success and mate choice of brown trout - females fishing for optimal MHC dissimilarity.

Authors:  L A Forsberg; J Dannewitz; E Petersson; M Grahn
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity?

Authors:  C Wedekind; S Füri
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations.

Authors:  T C Marshall; J Slate; L E Kruuk; J M Pemberton
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Lifetime reproductive success is maximized with optimal major histocompatibility complex diversity.

Authors:  Martin Kalbe; Christophe Eizaguirre; Ilka Dankert; Thorsten B H Reusch; Ralf D Sommerfeld; K Mathias Wegner; Manfred Milinski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  9 in total

1.  Social discrimination by quantitative assessment of immunogenetic similarity.

Authors:  Jandouwe Villinger; Bruce Waldman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The relationship between sexual selection and sexual conflict.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Mate choice for major histocompatibility complex genetic divergence as a bet-hedging strategy in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).

Authors:  Melissa L Evans; Mélanie Dionne; Kristina M Miller; Louis Bernatchez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sex-specific differences in swimming, aerobic metabolism and recovery from exercise in adult coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) across ecologically relevant temperatures.

Authors:  K Kraskura; E A Hardison; A G Little; T Dressler; T S Prystay; B Hendriks; A P Farrell; S J Cooke; D A Patterson; S G Hinch; E J Eliason
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.079

5.  Cryptic female choice enhances fertilization success and embryo survival in chinook salmon.

Authors:  Patrice Rosengrave; Robert Montgomerie; Neil Gemmell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Can sexual selection theory inform genetic management of captive populations? A review.

Authors:  Rémi Chargé; Céline Teplitsky; Gabriele Sorci; Matthew Low
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Male coercive mating in externally fertilizing species: male coercion, female reluctance and explanation for female acceptance.

Authors:  Yukio Matsumoto; Takeshi Takegaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Using Reciprocal Transplants to Assess Local Adaptation, Genetic Rescue, and Sexual Selection in Newly Established Populations.

Authors:  Jacques Labonne; Aurélie Manicki; Louise Chevalier; Marin Tétillon; François Guéraud; Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  Reproductive success in wild and hatchery male coho salmon.

Authors:  Bryan D Neff; Shawn R Garner; Ian A Fleming; Mart R Gross
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.963

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.