Literature DB >> 19864160

High-risk retrieval of adherent and chronically implanted IVC filters: techniques for removal and management of thrombotic complications.

William T Kuo1, Ricky T Tong, Gloria L Hwang, John D Louie, Edward A Lebowitz, Daniel Y Sze, Lawrence V Hofmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of aggressive techniques for retrieving adherent and chronically implanted inferior vena cava (IVC) filters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent attempted filter retrieval from October 2007 through October 2008. Patients were included in the study if they had an adherent filter, refractory to standard retrieval techniques, and underwent high-risk retrieval after procedural risks were deemed lower than risks of long-term filter implantation.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients were diagnosed with an adherent filter, 13 (93%) of whom were candidates for high-risk retrieval. These patients included seven men and six women (mean age, 40 years; age range, 18-71 years). Nine of the 13 patients (69%) were referred from an outside hospital. Filter retrieval was performed for the following indications: to avoid the risk of long-term thrombotic complications in a young patient (n= 6), to treat symptomatic filter-related IVC stenosis (n= 5), to treat symptomatic filter penetration (n= 1), and to avoid the need for lifelong anticoagulation (n= 1). There were eight Günther-Tulip filters (mean dwell time, 356 days; range 53-1,181 days), two Optease filters (mean dwell time, 62 days; range, 52-72 days), one G2 filter (dwell time, 420 days), and two Recovery filters (mean dwell time, 1,630 days; range, 1,429-1,830 days). Three IVC occlusions necessitated recanalization to facilitate retrieval. High-risk retrieval with use of various techniques with aggressive force was successful in all 13 patients (100%). Partial caval thrombosis occurred in the first four patients (31%) but did not occur after procedural modifications were implemented. There were no complications at clinical follow-up (mean, 221 days; range, 84-452 days).
CONCLUSIONS: Alternative techniques can be used to retrieve adherent IVC filters implanted for up to 3-5 years. Although caval thrombosis was an observed complication, protocol modifications appeared to reduce this risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19864160     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  14 in total

1.  A 7-year retrospective review of the technical success of the "low-profile" hangman technique for complicated inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrievals.

Authors:  Heather Kate Moriarty; Elissa Marshall; Warren Clements
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 2.  Complications of inferior vena cava filters.

Authors:  Simer Grewal; Murthy R Chamarthy; Sanjeeva P Kalva
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-12

3.  [Who is responsible for the removal of inferior vena cava filters?].

Authors:  D Baschera; J Sebunya; R Zellweger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  Inferior vena cava filter retrievals, standard and novel techniques.

Authors:  Gokhan Kuyumcu; T Gregory Walker
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-12

5.  Malignant epithelioid angiomyolipoma invading the inferior vena cava: Using a temporary vena cava filter to prevent tumour emboli during nephrectomy.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Runming Liu; Dalin He
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Can Pre-Retrieval Computed Tomography Predict the Difficult Removal of an Implementing an Inferior Vena Cava Filter?

Authors:  Shinho Hong; Keun-Myoung Park; Yong Sun Jeon; Soon Gu Cho; Kee Chun Hong; Woo Young Shin; Yun-Mee Choe
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2016-12-31

7.  Bidirectional Pull-Back Technique for Retrieval of Strut-Embedded Cylinder-Shaped Filters in Inferior Vena Cava.

Authors:  Xiaolong Du; Chenglong Li; Aimin Qian; Yeqing Zhang; Wendong Li; Huiying Yu; Xiaoqiang Li; Lingshang Kong
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-06-09

8.  Transcatheter thrombolytic therapy for symptomatic thrombo-occlusion of inferior vena cava filter.

Authors:  Liang Xiao; Jing Shen; Jia-Jie Tong; Zhe Zhang; Xiao-Lin Mu; Zheng-Jia Yi; Shuo Bai; Ke Xu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 9.  Retrievable inferior vena cava filters for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Han Ni; Lei Lei Win
Journal:  ISRN Radiol       Date:  2013-04-22

10.  Is external compression on the IVC a risk factor for IVC filter abutment? A single center experience of 141 infrarenal celect filter insertions.

Authors:  Sang Yub Lee; Jongmin Lee
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2018-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.