Literature DB >> 19863354

Hearing status, need for recovery after work, and psychosocial work characteristics: results from an internet-based national survey on hearing.

Janneke Nachtegaal1, Dirk J Kuik, Johannes R Anema, S Theo Goverts, Joost M Festen, Sophia E Kramer.   

Abstract

The main aim of the study is to address the relationship between hearing status and need for recovery. In addition, the role of hearing status in the relationship between psychosocial work characteristics (i.e. job demands and job control) and need for recovery was assessed. The sample comprised 925 normally-hearing and hearing-impaired working adults (aged 18-65 years) participating in the National Longitudinal Study on Hearing. Hearing status was determined using the national hearing (speech-in-noise) test over the internet. Psychosocial work characteristics and need for recovery were assessed using the job content questionnaire and the Dutch questionnaire on the experience and assessment of work. Regression models revealed a significant association between hearing status and need for recovery after work, poorer hearing leading to an increasing need for recovery. Additionally, poorer hearing led to a higher odds for risky levels of need for recovery. Hearing status did not influence the significant relationship between psychosocial work characteristics (i.e. job demand and job control) and need for recovery after work. Implications for clinical practice, such as the necessity of having adequate enablement programs for this specific group of patients, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19863354     DOI: 10.1080/14992020902962421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  48 in total

1.  Salivary Cortisol Profiles of Children with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Fred H Bess; Samantha J Gustafson; Blythe A Corbett; E Warren Lambert; Stephen M Camarata; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  A Taxonomy of Fatigue Concepts and Their Relation to Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Graham Naylor; Fred H Bess
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Listening Effort in Younger and Older Adults: A Comparison of Auditory-Only and Auditory-Visual Presentations.

Authors:  Mitchell S Sommers; Damian Phelps
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Commentary: listening can be exhausting--fatigue in children and adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Fred H Bess; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  A Comparison of Two Methods for Measuring Listening Effort As Part of an Audiologic Test Battery.

Authors:  Jani Johnson; Jingjing Xu; Robyn Cox; Paul Pendergraft
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  The Effects of Meaning-Based Auditory Training on Behavioral Measures of Perceptual Effort in Individuals with Impaired Hearing.

Authors:  Mitchell S Sommers; Nancy Tye-Murray; Joe Barcroft; Brent P Spehar
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

7.  The Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Listening Effort in Adults With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Julia Gordon; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Speech-perception training for older adults with hearing loss impacts word recognition and effort.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 9.  Listening-Related Fatigue in Children With Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Fred H Bess; Hilary Davis; Stephen Camarata; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Kenneth I Vaden; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.