SUMMARY: We estimated the excess hospital expenditure attributable to osteoporotic hip fracture (HF) within a population of 6,019 patients. Post-fracture excess of hospital days was 23.1, including 22.7 days in rehabilitation care. HF might result from a patient's pre-fracture poor health status rather than predispose to a worsening of such pre-existing conditions. INTRODUCTION: Hip fracture represents a large burden on hospital services. It is unclear whether the post-fracture expenditure is linked to a worsening of pre-fracture comorbid conditions. We estimated the excess hospital expenditure attributable to osteoporotic HF following the initial hospitalization for acute care (index stay). METHODS: We identified 6,019 patients (> or = 50 years) who experienced HF in 2005 and compared their hospitalizations 1 year before and 1 year after the index stay. Excess expenditure was estimated by subtracting the utilization of hospital days or costs (Euros 2005) before the index stay from those after the index stay. Factors associated with hospitalization during the pre-fracture and post-fracture years were identified using multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: Beside the index stay, post-fracture excess of hospital days was 23.1 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) [21.8-24.3]), including 22.7 days (95% CI [21.7-23.7]) in rehabilitation care and 0.3 days (95% CI [0-0.9]) in acute care. Estimated excess cost per patient was <euro>5,986 (95% CI [5,638-6,335]) after the index stay, including <euro>5,673 (95% CI [5,419-5,928]) in rehabilitation care. Male and elderly patients were at higher risk to be hospitalized in acute care during the year preceding and succeeding HF. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporotic HF represents a pronounced excess expenditure in hospital, which is mostly linked to rehabilitation care. Considering that utilization of inpatient acute care was quite similar before and after the index stay, HF might result from a patient's pre-fracture poor health status, rather than predispose to a worsening of such pre-existing conditions.
SUMMARY: We estimated the excess hospital expenditure attributable to osteoporotic hip fracture (HF) within a population of 6,019 patients. Post-fracture excess of hospital days was 23.1, including 22.7 days in rehabilitation care. HF might result from a patient's pre-fracture poor health status rather than predispose to a worsening of such pre-existing conditions. INTRODUCTION:Hip fracture represents a large burden on hospital services. It is unclear whether the post-fracture expenditure is linked to a worsening of pre-fracture comorbid conditions. We estimated the excess hospital expenditure attributable to osteoporotic HF following the initial hospitalization for acute care (index stay). METHODS: We identified 6,019 patients (> or = 50 years) who experienced HF in 2005 and compared their hospitalizations 1 year before and 1 year after the index stay. Excess expenditure was estimated by subtracting the utilization of hospital days or costs (Euros 2005) before the index stay from those after the index stay. Factors associated with hospitalization during the pre-fracture and post-fracture years were identified using multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: Beside the index stay, post-fracture excess of hospital days was 23.1 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) [21.8-24.3]), including 22.7 days (95% CI [21.7-23.7]) in rehabilitation care and 0.3 days (95% CI [0-0.9]) in acute care. Estimated excess cost per patient was <euro>5,986 (95% CI [5,638-6,335]) after the index stay, including <euro>5,673 (95% CI [5,419-5,928]) in rehabilitation care. Male and elderly patients were at higher risk to be hospitalized in acute care during the year preceding and succeeding HF. CONCLUSIONS:Osteoporotic HF represents a pronounced excess expenditure in hospital, which is mostly linked to rehabilitation care. Considering that utilization of inpatient acute care was quite similar before and after the index stay, HF might result from a patient's pre-fracture poor health status, rather than predispose to a worsening of such pre-existing conditions.
Authors: Anthony D Harris; Douglas D Bradham; Mona Baumgarten; Ilene H Zuckerman; Jeffrey C Fink; Eli N Perencevich Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2004-05-12 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Julie A Pasco; Kerrie M Sanders; Frouckje M Hoekstra; Margaret J Henry; Geoffrey C Nicholson; Mark A Kotowicz Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2005-10-14 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: David Whyatt; Raji Tenneti; Julie Marsh; Sarah E Bolt; Anna Kemp; Laura Firth; Kevin Murray; Berwin Turlach; Alistair Vickery Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 2.983