Literature DB >> 19855344

A comparison of two stretching modalities on lower-limb range of motion measurements in recreational dancers.

Matthew Wyon1, Lee Felton, Shaun Galloway.   

Abstract

Most stretching techniques are designed to place a "stress" on the musculoskeletal unit that will increase its resting length and range of motion (ROM). Twenty-four adolescent dancers participated in a 6-week intervention program that compared low-intensity stretching (Microstretching) with moderate-intensity static stretching on active and passive ranges of motion. Microstretching is a new modality that reduces the possibility of the parasympathetic system being activated. Repeated measures analysis indicated changes in ROM over the intervention period (p < 0.05), with the Microstretching group demonstrating greater increases in passive and active ROM than the static stretch group (p < 0.01); there was no noted bilateral differences in ROM. The results from this study agree with past studies that have found that stretching increases the compliance of any given muscle and therefore increases the range of motion. One main finding of the present study was that throughout a 6-week training program very-low-intensity stretching had a greater positive effect on lower-limb ROM than moderate-intensity static stretching. The most interesting aspect of the study was the greater increase in active ROM compared to passive ROM by the Microstretching group. This suggests that adaptation has occurred within the muscle itself to a greater extent than in structures of the hip joint. Practical application for this technique suggests it is beneficial as a postexercise modality that potentially has a restorative component.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19855344     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b3e198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  Acute and chronic effects of static stretching at 100% versus 120% intensity on flexibility.

Authors:  Taizan Fukaya; Shingo Matsuo; Masahiro Iwata; Eiji Yamanaka; Wakako Tsuchida; Yuji Asai; Shigeyuki Suzuki
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  THE EFFECT OF A RHYTHMIC GYMNASTICS-BASED POWER-FLEXIBILITY PROGRAM ON THE LOWER LIMB FLEXIBILITY AND POWER OF CONTEMPORARY DANCERS.

Authors:  Lauren Skopal; Kevin Netto; Brad Aisbett; Amir Takla; Troy Castricum
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-05

3.  Effect of dance on lower-limb range of motion in young people with cerebral palsy: a blinded randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Lavinia Teixeira-Machado; Josimari M DeSantana
Journal:  Adolesc Health Med Ther       Date:  2019-03-27

Review 4.  The relevance of stretch intensity and position-a systematic review.

Authors:  Nikos Apostolopoulos; George S Metsios; Andreas D Flouris; Yiannis Koutedakis; Matthew A Wyon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-18

5.  Comparison of Two Static Stretching Procedures on Hip Adductor Flexibility and Strength.

Authors:  Brandon M Fjerstad; Roger L Hammer; Adam M Hammer; Gavin Connolly; Karen V Lomond; Paul O'Connor
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2018-10-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.