Literature DB >> 19855292

Comparison of repeatability of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement made using the RTVue Fourier-domain optical coherence tomograph and the GDx scanning laser polarimeter with variable or enhanced corneal compensation.

Anita Garas1, Márta Tóth, Péter Vargha, Gábor Holló.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare repeatability of measurements of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) made using the RTVue-100 Fourier-domain optical coherence tomograph against repeatability of those made using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation or enhanced corneal compensation (GDx-VCC and GDx-ECC, respectively).
METHODS: One eye of each of 37 participants (14 normal and ocular hypertensive subjects, 11 patients with moderate, and 12 with severe glaucoma; groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively) was imaged using the RTVue Optic Nerve Head Map scan, GDx-VCC, and GDx-ECC, each 5 times on the same day. The coefficient of variation (CV) were compared. The P values <1% were considered as significant.
RESULTS: For average RNFLT CV was significantly lower with RTVue (2.11%) than with GDx-ECC (3.22%, P=0.004), for all participants. For temporal quadrant RNFLT in all participants, and group 1, CV with RTVue (4.88% and 3.30%) was significantly lower than with GDx-ECC (7.40% and 5.88%; P=0.004), and tended to be lower than with GDx-VCC (6.81% and 5.80%; P=0.011 and 0.016, respectively). For all participants, CV for inferior quadrant RNFLT was significantly lower with RTVue (3.49%) than with GDx-VCC (5.20%, P=0.002). No other difference was seen for any other parameter in any subject group.
CONCLUSIONS: Repeatability characterized by CV of RNFLT measurement with the RTVue Optic Nerve Head Map scan and GDx-VCC/GDx-ECC was similar, and sufficient for clinical purposes, both in normal subjects and in glaucoma patients with different disease severity. For average peripapillary RNFLT and temporal quadrant RNFLT, repeatability of RTVue was better than that of GDx-ECC, and tended to be better than that of GDx-VCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19855292     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181bdb549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  14 in total

1.  Detection of macular and circumpapillary structural loss in normal hemifield areas of glaucomatous eyes with localized visual field defects using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jung Hwa Na; Michael S Kook; Youngrok Lee; Sung Jin Yu; Jaewan Choi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Glaucoma research community and FDA look to the future, II: NEI/FDA Glaucoma Clinical Trial Design and Endpoints Symposium: measures of structural change and visual function.

Authors:  Robert N Weinreb; Paul L Kaufman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The comparison of manual vs automated disc margin delineation using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  S M Iverson; M Sehi
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  Test-retest variability in structural parameters measured with glaucoma imaging devices.

Authors:  Makoto Araie
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic nerve head parameters measured with cirrus HD-OCT in glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Mwanza; Robert T Chang; Donald L Budenz; Mary K Durbin; Mohamed G Gendy; Wei Shi; William J Feuer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Advanced imaging for glaucoma study: design, baseline characteristics, and inter-site comparison.

Authors:  Phuc V Le; Xinbo Zhang; Brian A Francis; Rohit Varma; David S Greenfield; Joel S Schuman; Nils Loewen; David Huang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Glaucomatous eye macular ganglion cell complex thickness and its relation to temporal circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Kita; Ritsuko Kita; Ai Nitta; Chiaki Nishimura; Goji Tomita
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of nerve fibre layer, macular thickness and optic disc measurements made with the RTVue-100 optical coherence tomograph to detect glaucoma.

Authors:  A Garas; P Vargha; G Holló
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 9.  Clinical application of ocular imaging.

Authors:  Zach Nadler; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Glaucoma Diagnosis and Monitoring Using Advanced Imaging Technologies.

Authors:  Mitra Sehi; Shawn M Iverson
Journal:  US Ophthalmic Rev       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.