Literature DB >> 19854701

Utilising the internet to test for sexually transmitted infections: results of a survey and accuracy testing.

Sherria L Owens1, Nick Arora, Nicole Quinn, Rosanna W Peeling, King K Holmes, Charlotte A Gaydos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Searching the internet for information about sexually transmitted infections (STI) is common. The goal of the study was to discover which internet sites offer STI tests and obtain information about the services and their validity.
METHODS: Using internet web-based search engines, information was collected from the sites about STI testing services, costs and types of tests offered, and tests were evaluated for accuracy. 'Business' functions regarding consent and return of results were investigated. Contact attempts were made by phone, e-mail or 'contact us' links and by mail. Test kits were ordered from six commercial internet sites and one public health site. Their accuracy was evaluated for chlamydia and gonorrhoea.
RESULTS: The study identified 27 national/international internet sites offering STI self-collection kits and services. Tests were available for gonorrhoea, syphilis, chlamydia, HIV, herpes, hepatitis viruses, trichomonas, mycoplasma and 'gardnerella'. All attempts to administer the survey yielded unsatisfactory results. After sending the survey by mail/e-mail to all the sites, four responded, two with the survey. Six websites appeared invalid based on non-deliverable e-mails and returned letters. The remainder did not respond. Test results were obtained from five of seven ordered kits. Two websites who were sent mocked urine specimens never provided results. The two 'perform-it-yourself' kits yielded false-negative results. Two mail-in urine specimens yielded correct positive results. The public health site kit yielded correct positive results.
CONCLUSIONS: The internet STI testing sites were difficult to contact and demonstrated unwillingness to answer consumer-specific questions. Test accuracy varied, with home tests having poor accuracy and mail-in specimens demonstrating high accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19854701     DOI: 10.1136/sti.2009.037226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  10 in total

Review 1.  Home versus clinic-based specimen collection for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Anna S Graseck; Shirley L Shih; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.091

2.  Acceptability of home-based chlamydia and gonorrhea testing among a national sample of sexual minority young adults.

Authors:  Annie-Laurie McRee; Allahna Esber; Paul L Reiter
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2015-03

3.  Performance of self-collected penile-meatal swabs compared to clinician-collected urethral swabs for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis, and Mycoplasma genitalium by nucleic acid amplification assays.

Authors:  Laura Dize; Perry Barnes; Mathilda Barnes; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Vincent Marsiglia; Della Duncan; Justin Hardick; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Knowledge and use of unauthorized HIV self-test kits among men who have sex with men in Spain, following approval of an over-the-counter self-test in the U.S: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Konstantinos Koutentakis; María Elena Rosales-Statkus; Juan Hoyos; Sonia Fernández-Balbuena; Mónica Ruiz; Cristina Agustí; Luis de la Fuente; María José Belza
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Usage of purchased self-tests for HIV and sexually transmitted infections in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: results of population-based and serial cross-sectional studies among the general population and sexual risk groups.

Authors:  Janneke P Bil; Maria Prins; Ineke G Stolte; Henriëtte Dijkshoorn; Titia Heijman; Marieke B Snijder; Udi Davidovich; Freke R Zuure
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Young people's perceptions of smartphone-enabled self-testing and online care for sexually transmitted infections: qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Catherine R H Aicken; Sebastian S Fuller; Lorna J Sutcliffe; Claudia S Estcourt; Voula Gkatzidou; Pippa Oakeshott; Kate Hone; S Tariq Sadiq; Pam Sonnenberg; Maryam Shahmanesh
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Comparing mail-in self-collected specimens sent via United States Postal Service versus clinic-collected specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in extra-genital sites.

Authors:  Katheryn R Salow; Adam C Cohen; Claire C Bristow; Mark R McGrath; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Use of the Internet for Sexual Health Among Sexually Experienced Persons Aged 16 to 44 Years: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Survey of the British Population.

Authors:  Catherine R H Aicken; Claudia S Estcourt; Anne M Johnson; Pam Sonnenberg; Kaye Wellings; Catherine H Mercer
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Actual and preferred contraceptive sources among young people: findings from the British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles.

Authors:  Rebecca S Geary; Caroline Tomes; Kyle G Jones; Anna Glasier; Wendy Macdowall; Jessica Datta; Pam Sonnenberg; Kaye Wellings; Rebecca S French; Catherine H Mercer; Anne M Johnson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Sexual health clinic attendance and non-attendance in Britain: findings from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3).

Authors:  Clare Tanton; Rebecca S Geary; Soazig Clifton; Nigel Field; Katie L Heap; Fiona Mapp; Gwenda Hughes; Anne M Johnson; Jackie A Cassell; Pam Sonnenberg; Catherine H Mercer
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.519

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.