Literature DB >> 19854307

Comparison of hip fracture risk prediction by femoral aBMD to experimentally measured factor of risk.

Benjamin J Roberts1, Erica Thrall, John A Muller, Mary L Bouxsein.   

Abstract

Areal BMD (aBMD) derived from DXA is currently the gold standard for diagnosis of osteoporosis. A biomechanical approach to fracture risk assessment comparing the ratio of applied load to bone strength, termed the factor of risk (Phi), may be useful to better identify patients at risk for fracture. We obtained 73 human cadaveric femurs (48 women and 25 men, aged 74.2+/-8.7 years, range 55-98 years), measured femoral neck (FN) aBMD by DXA, and mechanically tested the femurs to failure in a sideways fall configuration. The force applied to the hip during a sideways fall was estimated from height and weight, and accounted for trochanteric soft tissue thickness. Compared to men, women had significantly lower FN aBMD and femoral strength, and tended to have higher factor of risk for hip fracture Phi. Fifty-three of 54 (98%) specimens that had a FN aBMD T-score below -2.5 also had a Phi>1. However, 10/19 (53%) specimens with FN aBMD T-score above -2.5 also had Phi>1. These data indicate that whereas an aBMD-based diagnosis of osteoporosis is highly associated with fracture risk as assessed by the factor of risk, about 50% of individuals not designated as osteoporotic by aBMD testing would be at high risk for hip fracture should they experience a sideways fall. These findings strongly support the investigation of new biomechanically-based methods of fracture risk prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19854307     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  17 in total

1.  Fractures in Relation to Menstrual Status and Bone Parameters in Young Athletes.

Authors:  Kathryn E Ackerman; Natalia Cano Sokoloff; Giovana DE Nardo Maffazioli; Hannah M Clarke; Hang Lee; Madhusmita Misra
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 2.  Body composition and skeletal health: too heavy? Too thin?

Authors:  Alexander Faje; Anne Klibanski
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Local bone quality measurements correlates with maximum screw torque at the femoral diaphysis.

Authors:  Christopher M McAndrew; Avinesh Agarwalla; Adam C Abraham; Eric Feuchtbaum; William M Ricci; Simon Y Tang
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Comparison of hip geometry, strength, and estimated fracture risk in women with anorexia nervosa and overweight/obese women.

Authors:  Katherine Neubecker Bachmann; Pouneh K Fazeli; Elizabeth A Lawson; Brian M Russell; Ariana D Riccio; Erinne Meenaghan; Anu V Gerweck; Kamryn Eddy; Tara Holmes; Mark Goldstein; Thomas Weigel; Seda Ebrahimi; Diane Mickley; Suzanne Gleysteen; Miriam A Bredella; Anne Klibanski; Karen K Miller
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Functional disuse initiates medullary endosteal micro-architectural impairment in cortical bone characterized by nanoindentation.

Authors:  Kartikey Grover; Minyi Hu; Liangjun Lin; Jesse Muir; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 6.  Prophylactic augmentation of the osteoporotic proximal femur-mission impossible?

Authors:  Peter Varga; Ladina Hofmann-Fliri; Michael Blauth; Markus Windolf
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-12-07

7.  Multiscale Predictors of Femoral Neck In Situ Strength in Aging Women: Contributions of BMD, Cortical Porosity, Reference Point Indentation, and Nonenzymatic Glycation.

Authors:  Adam C Abraham; Avinesh Agarwalla; Aditya Yadavalli; Christopher McAndrew; Jenny Y Liu; Simon Y Tang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Factors associated with proximal femur fracture determined in a large cadaveric cohort.

Authors:  Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Timothy L Rossman; Asghar Rezaei; Kent D Carlson; David F Kallmes; John A Skinner; Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  The factor-of-risk biomechanical approach predicts hip fracture in men and women: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  A B Dufour; B Roberts; K E Broe; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein; M T Hannan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.