OBJECTIVE: To investigate the annual rate of tuberculosis (TB) infection among newly employed nurses using both tuberculin skin test (TST) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G; Cellestis Limited) assay. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study involving newly employed nurses. SETTING: A tertiary care university hospital in South Korea. METHODS: All participants (n = 196) were tested with the TST and QFT-G assay at baseline. After 1 year, the TST and QFT-G assay were reperformed for subjects who had negative TST results at baseline and for all subjects, respectively. RESULTS: The baseline TST and QFT-G assays were positive for 101 subjects (51.5%) and 28 subjects (14.3%), respectively; 22 subjects (11.2%) had positive results of both tests. Although the overall between-test agreement was 54.9% (k = 0.151) [95% confidence interval, 0.047-0.245]), agreement improved to 78.5% (k = 0.462 [95% confidence interval, 0.007-0.917]) for subjects who had not received bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination. After 1 year, the TST yielded positive results for 16 (21.3%) of 75 nurses with negative baseline results, and the QFT-G assay yielded positive results for 21 (14.4%) of 146 subjects with negative baseline results. Collectively, 5 subjects (3.0%) experienced conversion to positive results with both tests, and 32 subjects (18.9%) experienced conversion to positive results with one of the tests. Neither the employing hospital department nor exposure to patients with TB affected test conversion status. CONCLUSIONS: The poor overall agreement between TST and QFT-G results may have been caused by the confounding effect of bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination. The annual risk of TB infection among newly employed nurses was at least 3% on the basis of results of both the TST and QFT-G test. Stricter preventive strategies against TB spread should be implemented in our hospital.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the annual rate of tuberculosis (TB) infection among newly employed nurses using both tuberculin skin test (TST) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G; Cellestis Limited) assay. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study involving newly employed nurses. SETTING: A tertiary care university hospital in South Korea. METHODS: All participants (n = 196) were tested with the TST and QFT-G assay at baseline. After 1 year, the TST and QFT-G assay were reperformed for subjects who had negative TST results at baseline and for all subjects, respectively. RESULTS: The baseline TST and QFT-G assays were positive for 101 subjects (51.5%) and 28 subjects (14.3%), respectively; 22 subjects (11.2%) had positive results of both tests. Although the overall between-test agreement was 54.9% (k = 0.151) [95% confidence interval, 0.047-0.245]), agreement improved to 78.5% (k = 0.462 [95% confidence interval, 0.007-0.917]) for subjects who had not received bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination. After 1 year, the TST yielded positive results for 16 (21.3%) of 75 nurses with negative baseline results, and the QFT-G assay yielded positive results for 21 (14.4%) of 146 subjects with negative baseline results. Collectively, 5 subjects (3.0%) experienced conversion to positive results with both tests, and 32 subjects (18.9%) experienced conversion to positive results with one of the tests. Neither the employing hospital department nor exposure to patients with TB affected test conversion status. CONCLUSIONS: The poor overall agreement between TST and QFT-G results may have been caused by the confounding effect of bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination. The annual risk of TB infection among newly employed nurses was at least 3% on the basis of results of both the TST and QFT-G test. Stricter preventive strategies against TB spread should be implemented in our hospital.
Authors: Felix C Ringshausen; Albert Nienhaus; José Torres Costa; Heiko Knoop; Stephan Schlösser; Gerhard Schultze-Werninghaus; Gernot Rohde Journal: Clin Vaccine Immunol Date: 2011-05-18
Authors: Madhukar Pai; Claudia M Denkinger; Sandra V Kik; Molebogeng X Rangaka; Alice Zwerling; Olivia Oxlade; John Z Metcalfe; Adithya Cattamanchi; David W Dowdy; Keertan Dheda; Niaz Banaei Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: John Z Metcalfe; Adithya Cattamanchi; Charles E McCulloch; Justin D Lew; Ngan P Ha; Edward A Graviss Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Merve Nazli Eralp; Stefan Scholtes; Geraldine Martell; Robert Winter; Andrew Robert Exley Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Song Yee Kim; Moo Suk Park; Young Sam Kim; Se Kyu Kim; Joon Chang; Dongeun Yong; Hyun Sook Kim; Kyungwon Lee; Young Ae Kang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 3.240