BACKGROUND: Though recent reports have indicated a higher prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in laboratory personnel than in other healthcare workers, these studies included only a limited number of laboratory personnel. METHODS: We have thus focused on the laboratory personnel, who had a high level of exposure to specimens from patients with TB. We recruited 173 laboratory personnel and performed QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test (QFT-G) and tuberculin skin test (TST). RESULTS: QFT-G was positive in 21.4% of the enrolled laboratory personnel, and TST was positive in 33.3%. The agreement between the two tests was fair (κ = 0.234). In multivariate analyses, household contactwith TBpatients (P = 0.013), the laboratory sections of microbiology (P = 0.045) and chemistry/immunology (P = 0.014) were shown to be significantly associated with positive QFT-G results. CONCLUSION: Our data show a high prevalence of TST and QFT-G positivity in laboratory personnel and emphasize the importance of LTBI screening for laboratory personnel. In BCG-vaccinated populations with an intermediate incidence setting, QFT-G seems to be superior to TST as a screening tool for the detection of LTBI. Further study, including results of follow-up tests will be helpful for confirmation of our findings.
BACKGROUND: Though recent reports have indicated a higher prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in laboratory personnel than in other healthcare workers, these studies included only a limited number of laboratory personnel. METHODS: We have thus focused on the laboratory personnel, who had a high level of exposure to specimens from patients with TB. We recruited 173 laboratory personnel and performed QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test (QFT-G) and tuberculin skin test (TST). RESULTS: QFT-G was positive in 21.4% of the enrolled laboratory personnel, and TST was positive in 33.3%. The agreement between the two tests was fair (κ = 0.234). In multivariate analyses, household contactwith TBpatients (P = 0.013), the laboratory sections of microbiology (P = 0.045) and chemistry/immunology (P = 0.014) were shown to be significantly associated with positive QFT-G results. CONCLUSION: Our data show a high prevalence of TST and QFT-G positivity in laboratory personnel and emphasize the importance of LTBI screening for laboratory personnel. In BCG-vaccinated populations with an intermediate incidence setting, QFT-G seems to be superior to TST as a screening tool for the detection of LTBI. Further study, including results of follow-up tests will be helpful for confirmation of our findings.
Authors: J Y Lee; H J Choi; I-N Park; S-B Hong; Y-M Oh; C-M Lim; S D Lee; Y Koh; W S Kim; D S Kim; W D Kim; T S Shim Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2006-04-12 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: G H Mazurek; P A LoBue; C L Daley; J Bernardo; A A Lardizabal; W R Bishai; M F Iademarco; J S Rothel Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-10-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Madhukar Pai; Kaustubh Gokhale; Rajnish Joshi; Sandeep Dogra; Shriprakash Kalantri; Deepak K Mendiratta; Pratibha Narang; Charles L Daley; Reuben M Granich; Gerald H Mazurek; Arthur L Reingold; Lee W Riley; John M Colford Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-06-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Tan N Doan; Damon P Eisen; Morgan T Rose; Andrew Slack; Grace Stearnes; Emma S McBryde Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Chang Gyo Yoon; Soo Yon Oh; Jin Beom Lee; Mi Hyun Kim; Younsuk Seo; Juyoun Yang; Kyu Jung Bae; Seoyean Hong; Eun Suk Yang; Hee Jin Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 2.153