Literature DB >> 19847164

Mutation load and rapid adaptation favour outcrossing over self-fertilization.

Levi T Morran1, Michelle D Parmenter, Patrick C Phillips.   

Abstract

The tendency of organisms to reproduce by cross-fertilization despite numerous disadvantages relative to self-fertilization is one of the oldest puzzles in evolutionary biology. For many species, the primary obstacle to the evolution of outcrossing is the cost of production of males, individuals that do not directly contribute offspring and thus diminish the long-term reproductive output of a lineage. Self-fertilizing ('selfing') organisms do not incur the cost of males and therefore should possess at least a twofold numerical advantage over most outcrossing organisms. Two competing explanations for the widespread prevalence of outcrossing in nature despite this inherent disadvantage are the avoidance of inbreeding depression generated by selfing and the ability of outcrossing populations to adapt more rapidly to environmental change. Here we show that outcrossing is favoured in populations of Caenorhabditis elegans subject to experimental evolution both under conditions of increased mutation rate and during adaptation to a novel environment. In general, fitness increased with increasing rates of outcrossing. Thus, each of the standard explanations for the maintenance of outcrossing are correct, and it is likely that outcrossing is the predominant mode of reproduction in most species because it is favoured under ecological conditions that are ubiquitous in natural environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19847164      PMCID: PMC4183137          DOI: 10.1038/nature08496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  21 in total

1.  Selection and maintenance of androdioecy in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Andrew D Stewart; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Sex releases the speed limit on evolution.

Authors:  Nick Colegrave
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-12-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Mutation accumulation in populations of varying size: the distribution of mutational effects for fitness correlates in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Suzanne Estes; Patrick C Phillips; Dee R Denver; W Kelley Thomas; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genetic variation for outcrossing among Caenorhabditis elegans isolates.

Authors:  Henrique Teotónio; Diogo Manoel; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Selection against males in Caenorhabditis elegans under two mutational treatments.

Authors:  Diogo Manoel; Sara Carvalho; Patrick C Phillips; Henrique Teotónio
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Purging the genome with sexual selection: reducing mutation load through selection on males.

Authors:  Michael C Whitlock; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Why are there males in the hermaphroditic species Caenorhabditis elegans?

Authors:  J R Chasnov; King L Chow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The evolutionary advantage of recombination.

Authors:  J Felsenstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Population genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans: the paradox of low polymorphism in a widespread species.

Authors:  Arjun Sivasundar; Jody Hey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Inducible antibacterial defense system in C. elegans.

Authors:  Gustavo V Mallo; C Léopold Kurz; Carole Couillault; Nathalie Pujol; Samuel Granjeaud; Yuji Kohara; Jonathan J Ewbank
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-07-23       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  86 in total

1.  Do males facilitate the spread of novel phenotypes within populations of the androdioecious nematode Caenorhabditis elegans?

Authors:  Viktoria Wegewitz; Hinrich Schulenburg; Adrian Streit
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.402

Review 2.  Reproductive isolation during domestication.

Authors:  Hannes Dempewolf; Kathryn A Hodgins; Sonja E Rummell; Norman C Ellstrand; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Multiple reciprocal adaptations and rapid genetic change upon experimental coevolution of an animal host and its microbial parasite.

Authors:  Rebecca D Schulte; Carsten Makus; Barbara Hasert; Nico K Michiels; Hinrich Schulenburg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Higher rates of sex evolve in spatially heterogeneous environments.

Authors:  Lutz Becks; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Coalescent Times and Patterns of Genetic Diversity in Species with Facultative Sex: Effects of Gene Conversion, Population Structure, and Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Matthew Hartfield; Stephen I Wright; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Evolutionary biology: Why reproduction often takes two.

Authors:  Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Experimental coevolution: rapid local adaptation by parasites depends on host mating system.

Authors:  Levi T Morran; Raymond C Parrish; Ian A Gelarden; Michael B Allen; Curtis M Lively
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Self/nonself perception, reproduction and the extended MHC.

Authors:  Andreas Ziegler; Pablo Sandro Carvalho Santos; Thomas Kellermann; Barbara Uchanska-Ziegler
Journal:  Self Nonself       Date:  2010-06-21

9.  The role of advantageous mutations in enhancing the evolution of a recombination modifier.

Authors:  Matthew Hartfield; Sarah P Otto; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  The development of sexual dimorphism: studies of the Caenorhabditis elegans male.

Authors:  Scott W Emmons
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 5.814

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.