Literature DB >> 19846369

Color graphs for automated cancer diagnosis and grading.

Dogan Altunbay1, Celal Cigir, Cenk Sokmensuer, Cigdem Gunduz-Demir.   

Abstract

This paper reports a new structural method to mathematically represent and quantify a tissue for the purpose of automated and objective cancer diagnosis and grading. Unlike the previous structural methods, which quantify a tissue considering the spatial distributions of its cell nuclei, the proposed method relies on the use of distributions of multiple tissue components for the representation. To this end, it constructs a graph on multiple tissue components and colors its edges depending on the component types of their endpoints. Subsequently, it extracts a new set of structural features from these color graphs and uses these features in the classification of tissues. Working with the images of colon tissues, our experiments demonstrate that the color-graph approach leads to 82.65% test accuracy and that it significantly improves the performance of its counterparts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19846369     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2033804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  12 in total

1.  [Fractal geometry in the objective grading of prostate carcinoma].

Authors:  P Waliszewski; F Wagenlehner; S Gattenlöhner; W Weidner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Patch-based Convolutional Neural Network for Whole Slide Tissue Image Classification.

Authors:  Le Hou; Dimitris Samaras; Tahsin M Kurc; Yi Gao; James E Davis; Joel H Saltz
Journal:  Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit       Date:  2016 Jun-Jul

3.  Exploring automatic prostate histopathology image Gleason grading via local structure modeling.

Authors:  Daihou Wang; David J Foran; Jian Ren; Hua Zhong; Isaac Y Kim; Xin Qi
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015

4.  [Objective grading of prostate carcinoma based on fractal dimensions: Gleason 3 + 4= 7a ≠ Gleason 4 + 3 =7b].

Authors:  P Waliszewski; F Wagenlehner; S Kribus; W Schafhauser; W Weidner; S Gattenlöhner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Homology-based method for detecting regions of interest in colonic digital images.

Authors:  Kazuaki Nakane; Akihiro Takiyama; Seiji Mori; Nariaki Matsuura
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 2.644

6.  Augmenting multi-instance multilabel learning with sparse bayesian models for skin biopsy image analysis.

Authors:  Gang Zhang; Jian Yin; Xiangyang Su; Yongjing Huang; Yingrong Lao; Zhaohui Liang; Shanxing Ou; Honglai Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The Quantitative Criteria Based on the Fractal Dimensions, Entropy, and Lacunarity for the Spatial Distribution of Cancer Cell Nuclei Enable Identification of Low or High Aggressive Prostate Carcinomas.

Authors:  Przemyslaw Waliszewski
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Determining similarity in histological images using graph-theoretic description and matching methods for content-based image retrieval in medical diagnostics.

Authors:  Harshita Sharma; Alexander Alekseychuk; Peter Leskovsky; Olaf Hellwich; R S Anand; Norman Zerbe; Peter Hufnagl
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 2.644

9.  Computer-based image studies on tumor nests mathematical features of breast cancer and their clinical prognostic value.

Authors:  Lin-Wei Wang; Ai-Ping Qu; Jing-Ping Yuan; Chuang Chen; Sheng-Rong Sun; Ming-Bai Hu; Juan Liu; Yan Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Segmentation and classification of colon glands with deep convolutional neural networks and total variation regularization.

Authors:  Philipp Kainz; Michael Pfeiffer; Martin Urschler
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.