BACKGROUND: Significant intra- and interobserver variability ranging between 40 and 80% is observed in tumor grading of prostate carcinoma. By combining geometric and statistical methods, an objective system of grading can be designed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The distributions of cell nuclei in two-dimensional patterns of prostate cancer classified subjectively as Gleason score 3+3, 3+4, 4+3, 4+4, 4+5, 5+4, and 5+5 were analyzed with algorithms measuring the global fractal dimensions of the Rényi family and with the algorithm for the local connected fractal dimension (LCFD). RESULTS: The dimensions for global fractal capacity, information, and correlation (standard deviation) were 1.470 (045), 1.528 (046), and 1.582 (099) for homogenous Gleason grade 3 (n = 16), 1.642 (034), 1.678 (041), and 1.673 (084) for homogenous Gleason grade 4 (n=18), and 1.797 (042), 1.791 (026), and 1.854 (031) for homogenous Gleason grade 5 (n=12), respectively. The LCFD algorithm can be used to distinguish both qualitatively and quantitatively between mixed and heterogeneous patterns, such as Gleason score 3+4=7a (intermediate risk cancer) and Gleason score 4+3=7b (high-risk cancer). Sensitivity of the method is 89.3%, and specificity 84.3%. CONCLUSION: The method of fractal geometry enables both an objective and quantitative grading of prostate cancer.
BACKGROUND: Significant intra- and interobserver variability ranging between 40 and 80% is observed in tumor grading of prostate carcinoma. By combining geometric and statistical methods, an objective system of grading can be designed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The distributions of cell nuclei in two-dimensional patterns of prostate cancer classified subjectively as Gleason score 3+3, 3+4, 4+3, 4+4, 4+5, 5+4, and 5+5 were analyzed with algorithms measuring the global fractal dimensions of the Rényi family and with the algorithm for the local connected fractal dimension (LCFD). RESULTS: The dimensions for global fractal capacity, information, and correlation (standard deviation) were 1.470 (045), 1.528 (046), and 1.582 (099) for homogenous Gleason grade 3 (n = 16), 1.642 (034), 1.678 (041), and 1.673 (084) for homogenous Gleason grade 4 (n=18), and 1.797 (042), 1.791 (026), and 1.854 (031) for homogenous Gleason grade 5 (n=12), respectively. The LCFD algorithm can be used to distinguish both qualitatively and quantitatively between mixed and heterogeneous patterns, such as Gleason score 3+4=7a (intermediate risk cancer) and Gleason score 4+3=7b (high-risk cancer). Sensitivity of the method is 89.3%, and specificity 84.3%. CONCLUSION: The method of fractal geometry enables both an objective and quantitative grading of prostate cancer.
Authors: Daniel M Berney; Ferran Algaba; Philippe Camparo; Eva Compérat; David Griffiths; Glen Kristiansen; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Rodolfo Montironi; Murali Varma; Lars Egevad Journal: Histopathology Date: 2013-11-06 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: T Wiegel; P Albers; R Bussar-Maatz; A Gottberg; M Härter; M Kieser; G Kristiansen; G Nettekoven; P Martus; H Schmidberger; S Wellek; M Stöckle Journal: Urologe A Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Paul L Nguyen; Delray Schultz; Andrew A Renshaw; Robin T Vollmer; William R Welch; Kerri Cote; Anthony V D'Amico Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Markus Loeffler; Lars Greulich; Patrick Scheibe; Philip Kahl; David Adler; Ulf-Dietrich Braumann; Jens-Peer Kuska; Nicolas Wernert Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-03-16 Impact factor: 7.450