Literature DB >> 19846324

The prognostic value of panoramic radiography of inferior alveolar nerve damage after mandibular third molar removal: retrospective study of 400 cases.

József Szalma1, Edina Lempel, Sára Jeges, Gyula Szabó, Lajos Olasz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to estimate the accuracy of panoramic radiographic signs predicting inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) paresthesia after lower third molar removal. STUDY
DESIGN: In a case-control study the sample was composed of 41 cases with postoperative IAN paresthesia and 359 control cases without it. The collected data included "classic" specific signs indicating a close spatial relationship between third molar root and inferior alveolar canal (IAC), root curvatures, and the extent of IAC-root tip overlap. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were completed to estimate the association between radiographic findings and IAN paresthesia.
RESULTS: The multivariate logistic analysis identified 3 signs significantly associated with IAN paresthesia (P < .001): interruption of the superior cortex of the canal wall, diversion of the canal, and darkening of the root. The sensitivities and specificities ranged from 14.6% to 68.3% and from 85.5% to 96.9%, respectively. The positive predictive values, calculated to factor a 1.1% prevalence of paresthesia, ranged from 3.6% to 10.9%, whereas the negative predictive values >99%.
CONCLUSION: Panoramic radiography is an inadequate screening method for predicting IAN paresthesia after mandibular third molar removal. Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19846324     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  33 in total

1.  Necessity of 3D visualization for the removal of lower wisdom teeth: required sample size to prove non-inferiority of panoramic radiography compared to CBCT.

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Daniel Wachtlin; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Correlation of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT findings in the assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal.

Authors:  F S Neves; T C Souza; S M Almeida; F Haiter-Neto; D Q Freitas; F N Bóscolo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  A multivariate statistical analysis on variables affecting inferior alveolar nerve damage during third molar surgery.

Authors:  R Pippi; M Santoro
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Quantitative pixel grey measurement of the "high-risk" sign, darkening of third molar roots: a pilot study.

Authors:  J Szalma; Z Bata; E Lempel; S Jeges; L Olasz
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Objectivity and reliability of panoramic radiographic signs of intimate relationship between impacted mandibular third molar and inferior alveolar nerve.

Authors:  Mohammad Zandi; Abbas Shokri; Ali Heidari; Elham Masoud Peykar
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-04-22

6.  Correlation of mandibular impacted tooth and bone morphology determined by cone beam computed topography on a premise of third molar operation.

Authors:  M A Momin; K Matsumoto; K Ejima; R Asaumi; T Kawai; Y Arai; K Honda; T Yosue
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Trigeminal nerve injuries after mandibular oral surgery in a university outpatient setting--a retrospective analysis of 1,559 cases.

Authors:  Herbert Deppe; Thomas Mücke; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Marco Kesting; Eva Linsenmeyer; Thomas Tölle
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Comparative study of dentascan and radiography for radiological evaluation of impacted teeth.

Authors:  Shruti Chandak; Chandrakant M Shetty
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-07-20

9.  3D imaging reconstruction and impacted third molars: case reports.

Authors:  Andrea Tuzi; Roberto Di Bari; Andrea Cicconetti
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2012-01-14

10.  Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Maria Eugenia Guerrero; Raul Botetano; Jorge Beltran; Keith Horner; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.