Literature DB >> 19845814

Identification of hemodynamically unstable arrhythmias using subcutaneous photoplethysmography.

Robert G Turcott1, Todd J Pavek.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Determination of hemodynamic status is central to arrhythmia management in the inpatient setting. In contrast, therapy decisions in implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are based exclusively on the arrhythmia's electrical signature. Hemodynamic sensing in ICDs would allow tailoring of therapy according to perfusion status. Subcutaneous photoplethysmography (PPG) is an attractive technology for this application because it responds to changes in arterial pressure and can be readily incorporated into the housing of implanted devices. This study evaluated the accuracy of PPG in identifying hemodynamically unstable simulated arrhythmias in an animal model. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Rapid atrial and ventricular pacing was used to simulate arrhythmias in an acute preparation of 7 healthy dogs. Aortic pressure and subcutaneous PPG were simultaneously recorded. Simulated arrhythmias were defined as hemodynamically unstable if aortic pressure decreased by >or=15 mmHg, marginally unstable if pressure decreased by 5-15 mmHg, and hemodynamically stable if pressure either increased or decreased by no more than 5 mmHg. An average of 56 arrhythmias were simulated in each animal. Changes in pressure and PPG output were highly correlated, with correlation coefficient of 0.7-0.9. Subcutaneous PPG identified hemodynamically unstable episodes with a sensitivity of 100% for 6 subjects and 80% for 1 subject. Specificity was more than 90% for 6 subjects and was 50% for 1 subject.
CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous PPG detects hemodynamically unstable simulated arrhythmias in an acute canine preparation. If successfully validated in humans, this technology may allow ICD therapy to be specifically tailored according to the hemodynamic status of the arrhythmia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19845814      PMCID: PMC5835358          DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01635.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  28 in total

1.  2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Inappropriate shock: a failure of SVT discriminators in a dual chamber ICD?

Authors:  Amin Al-Ahmad; Angela Tsiperfal; Henry H Hsia; Paul J Wang
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Do current dual chamber cardioverter defibrillators have advantages over conventional single chamber cardioverter defibrillators in reducing inappropriate therapies? A randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  I Deisenhofer; C Kolb; G Ndrepepa; J Schreieck; M Karch; S Schmieder; B Zrenner; C Schmitt
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-02

4.  Rhythm discrimination by rate branch and QRS morphology in dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Giuseppe Boriani; Mauro Biffi; Alberto Dall'Acqua; Cristian Martignani; Lorenzo Frabetti; Romano Zannoli; Angelo Branzi
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  The Rhythm ID Going Head to Head Trial (RIGHT): design of a randomized trial comparing competitive rhythm discrimination algorithms in implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Ronald D Berger; Darin R Lerew; Joseph M Smith; Chris Pulling; Michael R Gold
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-07

Review 6.  Biosensor applications to antitachycardia devices.

Authors:  T J Cohen; L B Liem
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in MADIT II: frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact.

Authors:  James P Daubert; Wojciech Zareba; David S Cannom; Scott McNitt; Spencer Z Rosero; Paul Wang; Claudio Schuger; Jonathan S Steinberg; Steven L Higgins; David J Wilber; Helmut Klein; Mark L Andrews; W Jackson Hall; Arthur J Moss
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Jeanne E Poole; George W Johnson; Anne S Hellkamp; Jill Anderson; David J Callans; Merritt H Raitt; Ramakota K Reddy; Francis E Marchlinski; Raymond Yee; Thomas Guarnieri; Mario Talajic; David J Wilber; Daniel P Fishbein; Douglas L Packer; Daniel B Mark; Kerry L Lee; Gust H Bardy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Short-term reproducibility over time of right ventricular pulse pressure as a potential hemodynamic sensor for ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Authors:  K A Ellenbogen; M A Wood; K Kapadia; B Lu; H Valenta
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Hemodynamic sensing using subcutaneous photoplethysmography.

Authors:  Robert G Turcott; Todd J Pavek
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.733

View more
  1 in total

1.  Quantification of Electromechanical Coupling to Prevent Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks.

Authors:  Daniel Keene; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Ahran D Arnold; James P Howard; David Lefroy; D Wyn Davies; Phang Boon Lim; Fu Siong Ng; Michael Koa-Wing; Norman A Qureshi; Nick W F Linton; Jaymin S Shah; Nicholas S Peters; Prapa Kanagaratnam; Darrel P Francis; Zachary I Whinnett
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-03-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.