Robert G Turcott1, Todd J Pavek. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5406, USA. turcott@stanford.edu
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Determination of hemodynamic status is central to arrhythmia management in the inpatient setting. In contrast, therapy decisions in implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are based exclusively on the arrhythmia's electrical signature. Hemodynamic sensing in ICDs would allow tailoring of therapy according to perfusion status. Subcutaneous photoplethysmography (PPG) is an attractive technology for this application because it responds to changes in arterial pressure and can be readily incorporated into the housing of implanted devices. This study evaluated the accuracy of PPG in identifying hemodynamically unstable simulated arrhythmias in an animal model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Rapid atrial and ventricular pacing was used to simulate arrhythmias in an acute preparation of 7 healthy dogs. Aortic pressure and subcutaneous PPG were simultaneously recorded. Simulated arrhythmias were defined as hemodynamically unstable if aortic pressure decreased by >or=15 mmHg, marginally unstable if pressure decreased by 5-15 mmHg, and hemodynamically stable if pressure either increased or decreased by no more than 5 mmHg. An average of 56 arrhythmias were simulated in each animal. Changes in pressure and PPG output were highly correlated, with correlation coefficient of 0.7-0.9. Subcutaneous PPG identified hemodynamically unstable episodes with a sensitivity of 100% for 6 subjects and 80% for 1 subject. Specificity was more than 90% for 6 subjects and was 50% for 1 subject. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous PPG detects hemodynamically unstable simulated arrhythmias in an acute canine preparation. If successfully validated in humans, this technology may allow ICD therapy to be specifically tailored according to the hemodynamic status of the arrhythmia.
INTRODUCTION: Determination of hemodynamic status is central to arrhythmia management in the inpatient setting. In contrast, therapy decisions in implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are based exclusively on the arrhythmia's electrical signature. Hemodynamic sensing in ICDs would allow tailoring of therapy according to perfusion status. Subcutaneous photoplethysmography (PPG) is an attractive technology for this application because it responds to changes in arterial pressure and can be readily incorporated into the housing of implanted devices. This study evaluated the accuracy of PPG in identifying hemodynamically unstable simulated arrhythmias in an animal model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Rapid atrial and ventricular pacing was used to simulate arrhythmias in an acute preparation of 7 healthy dogs. Aortic pressure and subcutaneous PPG were simultaneously recorded. Simulated arrhythmias were defined as hemodynamically unstable if aortic pressure decreased by >or=15 mmHg, marginally unstable if pressure decreased by 5-15 mmHg, and hemodynamically stable if pressure either increased or decreased by no more than 5 mmHg. An average of 56 arrhythmias were simulated in each animal. Changes in pressure and PPG output were highly correlated, with correlation coefficient of 0.7-0.9. Subcutaneous PPG identified hemodynamically unstable episodes with a sensitivity of 100% for 6 subjects and 80% for 1 subject. Specificity was more than 90% for 6 subjects and was 50% for 1 subject. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous PPG detects hemodynamically unstable simulated arrhythmias in an acute canine preparation. If successfully validated in humans, this technology may allow ICD therapy to be specifically tailored according to the hemodynamic status of the arrhythmia.
Authors: James P Daubert; Wojciech Zareba; David S Cannom; Scott McNitt; Spencer Z Rosero; Paul Wang; Claudio Schuger; Jonathan S Steinberg; Steven L Higgins; David J Wilber; Helmut Klein; Mark L Andrews; W Jackson Hall; Arthur J Moss Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-04-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jeanne E Poole; George W Johnson; Anne S Hellkamp; Jill Anderson; David J Callans; Merritt H Raitt; Ramakota K Reddy; Francis E Marchlinski; Raymond Yee; Thomas Guarnieri; Mario Talajic; David J Wilber; Daniel P Fishbein; Douglas L Packer; Daniel B Mark; Kerry L Lee; Gust H Bardy Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-09-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel Keene; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Ahran D Arnold; James P Howard; David Lefroy; D Wyn Davies; Phang Boon Lim; Fu Siong Ng; Michael Koa-Wing; Norman A Qureshi; Nick W F Linton; Jaymin S Shah; Nicholas S Peters; Prapa Kanagaratnam; Darrel P Francis; Zachary I Whinnett Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2019-03-27