Literature DB >> 19844650

Microbial protein in soil: influence of extraction method and C amendment on extraction and recovery.

Erin B Taylor1, Mark A Williams.   

Abstract

The capacity to study the content and resolve the dynamics of the proteome of diverse microbial communities would help to revolutionize the way microbiologists study the function and activity of microorganisms in soil. To better understand the limitations of a proteomic approach to studying soil microbial communities, we characterized extractable soil microbial proteins using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Two methods were utilized to extract proteins from microorganisms residing in a Quitman and Benfield soil: (1) direct extraction of bulk protein from soil and (2) separation of the microorganisms from soil using density gradient centrifugation and subsequent extraction (DGC-EXT) of microbial protein. In addition, glucose and toluene amendments to soil were used to stimulate the growth of a subset of the microbial community. A bacterial culture and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were added to the soil to qualitatively assess their recovery following extraction. Direct extraction and resolution of microbial proteins using SDS-PAGE generally resulted in smeared and unresolved banding patterns on gels. DGC-EXT of microbial protein from soil followed by separation using SDS-PAGE, however, did resolve six to 10 bands in the Benfield but not the Quitman soil. DGC-EXT of microbial protein, but not direct extraction following the addition of glucose and toluene, markedly increased the number of bands (approximately 40) on the gels in both Benfield and Quitman soils. Low recoveries of added culture and BSA proteins using the direct extraction method suggest that proteins either bind to soil organic matter and mineral particles or that partial degradation takes place during extraction. Interestingly, DGC may have been preferentially selected for actively growing cells, as gauged by the 10-100x lower cy19:0/18:1omega7 ratio of the fatty acid methyl esters in the isolated community compared to that for the whole soil. DGC can be used to isolate soil communities and provide microbial protein that can be characterized using PAGE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19844650     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-009-9593-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  22 in total

Review 1.  Mass spectrometry in proteomics.

Authors:  R Aebersold; D R Goodlett
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Quantification of bacterial subgroups in soil: comparison of DNA extracted directly from soil or from cells previously released by density gradient centrifugation.

Authors:  S Courtois; A Frostegård; P Göransson; G Depret; P Jeannin; P Simonet
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.491

3.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Linking toluene degradation with specific microbial populations in soil.

Authors:  J R Hanson; J L Macalady; D Harris; K M Scow
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Fate of prions in soil: adsorption and extraction by electroelution of recombinant ovine prion protein from montmorillonite and natural soils.

Authors:  Peggy Rigou; Human Rezaei; Jeanne Grosclaude; Siobhán Staunton; Hervé Quiquampoix
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Correlation between mRNA and protein abundance in Desulfovibrio vulgaris: a multiple regression to identify sources of variations.

Authors:  Lei Nie; Gang Wu; Weiwen Zhang
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Adsorption of Cry1Ab protein isolated from Bt transgenic rice on bentone, kaolin, humic acids, and soils.

Authors:  Haiyan Wang; Qingfu Ye; Jay Gan; Jianmin Wu
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 5.279

8.  Functional metaproteome analysis of protein extracts from contaminated soil and groundwater.

Authors:  Dirk Benndorf; Gerd U Balcke; Hauke Harms; Martin von Bergen
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Community proteomics of a natural microbial biofilm.

Authors:  Rachna J Ram; Nathan C Verberkmoes; Michael P Thelen; Gene W Tyson; Brett J Baker; Robert C Blake; Manesh Shah; Robert L Hettich; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Protein extraction and fingerprinting optimization of bacterial communities in natural environment.

Authors:  Maron Pierre-Alain; Mougel Christophe; Siblot Séverine; Abbas Houria; Lemanceau Philippe; Ranjard Lionel
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 4.192

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Metaproteomics: harnessing the power of high performance mass spectrometry to identify the suite of proteins that control metabolic activities in microbial communities.

Authors:  Robert L Hettich; Chongle Pan; Karuna Chourey; Richard J Giannone
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Comparative metaproteomic analysis on consecutively Rehmannia glutinosa-monocultured rhizosphere soil.

Authors:  Linkun Wu; Haibin Wang; Zhixing Zhang; Rui Lin; Zhongyi Zhang; Wenxiong Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Soil Metaproteomics for the Study of the Relationships Between Microorganisms and Plants: A Review of Extraction Protocols and Ecological Insights.

Authors:  Maria Tartaglia; Felipe Bastida; Rosaria Sciarrillo; Carmine Guarino
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Critical Assessment of MetaProteome Investigation (CAMPI): a multi-laboratory comparison of established workflows.

Authors:  Tim Van Den Bossche; Benoit J Kunath; Kay Schallert; Stephanie S Schäpe; Paul E Abraham; Jean Armengaud; Magnus Ø Arntzen; Ariane Bassignani; Dirk Benndorf; Stephan Fuchs; Richard J Giannone; Timothy J Griffin; Live H Hagen; Rashi Halder; Céline Henry; Robert L Hettich; Robert Heyer; Pratik Jagtap; Nico Jehmlich; Marlene Jensen; Catherine Juste; Manuel Kleiner; Olivier Langella; Theresa Lehmann; Emma Leith; Patrick May; Bart Mesuere; Guylaine Miotello; Samantha L Peters; Olivier Pible; Pedro T Queiros; Udo Reichl; Bernhard Y Renard; Henning Schiebenhoefer; Alexander Sczyrba; Alessandro Tanca; Kathrin Trappe; Jean-Pierre Trezzi; Sergio Uzzau; Pieter Verschaffelt; Martin von Bergen; Paul Wilmes; Maximilian Wolf; Lennart Martens; Thilo Muth
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Soil metaproteomics - Comparative evaluation of protein extraction protocols.

Authors:  Katharina M Keiblinger; Inés C Wilhartitz; Thomas Schneider; Bernd Roschitzki; Emanuel Schmid; Leo Eberl; Kathrin Riedel; Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern
Journal:  Soil Biol Biochem       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.609

6.  Metaproteomic analysis of ratoon sugarcane rhizospheric soil.

Authors:  Wenxiong Lin; Linkun Wu; Sheng Lin; Aijia Zhang; Mingming Zhou; Rui Lin; Haibin Wang; Jun Chen; Zhixing Zhang; Ruiyu Lin
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  A comparison of two colorimetric assays, based upon Lowry and Bradford techniques, to estimate total protein in soil extracts.

Authors:  M A Redmile-Gordon; E Armenise; R P White; P R Hirsch; K W T Goulding
Journal:  Soil Biol Biochem       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.609

Review 8.  Environmental Microbial Community Proteomics: Status, Challenges and Perspectives.

Authors:  Da-Zhi Wang; Ling-Fen Kong; Yuan-Yuan Li; Zhang-Xian Xie
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Soil and leaf litter metaproteomics-a brief guideline from sampling to understanding.

Authors:  Katharina M Keiblinger; Stephan Fuchs; Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern; Katharina Riedel
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 4.194

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.