Literature DB >> 19843485

Prediction of abstinence at 10 weeks based on smoking status at 2 weeks during a quit attempt: secondary analysis of two parallel, 10-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of 21-mg nicotine patch in adult smokers.

Stuart G Ferguson1, Joseph G Gitchell, Saul Shiffman, Mark A Sembower.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation outcomes are calculated as the probability of abstinence at follow-up among all enrolled smokers, but it is also useful to estimate the probability of success for those who experienced success or failure at earlier time points.
OBJECTIVES: The primary aims were to estimate the probability of maintaining abstinence through week 10 among subjects who were abstinent at week 2, and to assess the effect of active treatment with a nicotine patch. We also examined outcomes at week 6 and, among subjects who smoked during the first 2 weeks of treatment, the probability of reestablishing abstinence later, as well as the effect of active treatment on this outcome.
METHODS: We analyzed pooled data from 2 previously published, parallel, double-blind studies in which subjects were initially randomized to receive an active nicotine patch (starting at 21 mg) or a placebo patch. Subjects randomized to active treatment followed a double-blind step-down dosing regimen: 24-h/21-mg patches for the first 6 weeks of treatment, followed by 14- and 7-mg patches for successive 2-week periods. Biochemically verified abstinence (exhaled carbon monoxide <or=8 ppm) was assessed during laboratory visits.
RESULTS: Most subjects were white (94.8%) and female (61.6%), with a mean (SD) age of 43.1 (10.2) years. Subjects had been smoking for a mean of 24.5 (10.2) years and smoked a mean of 30.6 (10.4) cigarettes per day. In both the nicotine (n = 249) and placebo (n = 253) groups, all subjects who were abstinent during the first 2 weeks had a high probability of maintaining abstinence through week 10, but subjects treated with the active patch were significantly more likely to remain abstinent (active: 79.8% [67/84], placebo: 52.6% [20/38]; relative risk [RR] = 1.52 [95% CI, 1.10-2.09]). Also, at week 6, subjects receiving active treatment had a greater chance of remaining abstinent (active: 94.3% [82/87], placebo: 78.0% [32/41]; RR = 1.21 [95% CI, 1.02-1.43]). To assess the effect of treatment on recovery from smoking lapses, we examined the probability of abstinence during week 10 among subjects who smoked during the first 2 weeks of treatment. Among them, treatment was associated with a greater probability of later success: 31.4% (50/159) of those treated with the active patch and 12.5% (26/208) of those receiving placebo were abstinent at week 10 (RR = 2.52 [95% CI, 1.64-3.85]). Similar results were observed at week 6 (49.4% [80/162] vs 21.2% [45/212]; RR = 2.33 [95% CI, 1.72-3.15]).
CONCLUSIONS: More than two thirds (71.3%) of subjects who were abstinent 2 weeks into a quit attempt maintained that abstinence through the end of 10 weeks of treatment. Use of a nicotine patch was significantly associated with maintaining abstinence and with recovering abstinence after an early lapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19843485     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  12 in total

1.  Does Extended Pre Quit Bupropion Aid in Extinguishing Smoking Behavior?

Authors:  Larry W Hawk; Rebecca L Ashare; Jessica D Rhodes; Jason A Oliver; Kenneth Michael Cummings; Martin C Mahoney
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Within-day temporal patterns of smoking, withdrawal symptoms, and craving.

Authors:  Siddharth Chandra; Deborah Scharf; Saul Shiffman
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Different doses, durations and modes of delivery of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Nicola Lindson; Samantha C Chepkin; Weiyu Ye; Thomas R Fanshawe; Chris Bullen; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-18

4.  Smoking reductions and increased self-efficacy in a randomized controlled trial of smoking abstinence-contingent incentives in residential substance abuse treatment patients.

Authors:  Sheila M Alessi; Nancy M Petry
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Continuous Abstinence During Early Alcohol Treatment is Significantly Associated with Positive Treatment Outcomes, Independent of Duration of Abstinence.

Authors:  Kelly E Dunn; Joseph A Harrison; Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos; Dingfen Han; Eric C Strain
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 2.826

Review 6.  An efficient early phase 2 procedure to screen medications for efficacy in smoking cessation.

Authors:  Kenneth A Perkins; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  The first 7 days of a quit attempt predicts relapse: validation of a measure for screening medications for nicotine dependence.

Authors:  Rebecca L Ashare; E Paul Wileyto; Kenneth A Perkins; Robert A Schnoll
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.702

8.  Individualized real-time fMRI neurofeedback to attenuate craving in nicotine-dependent smokers.

Authors:  Karen J Hartwell; Colleen A Hanlon; Xingbao Li; Jeffrey J Borckardt; Melanie Canterberry; James J Prisciandaro; Megan M Moran Moran-Santa Maria; Todd LeMatty; Mark S George; Kathleen T Brady
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 9.  Nicotine replacement therapy versus control for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Samantha C Chepkin; Weiyu Ye; Chris Bullen; Tim Lancaster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-31

10.  Examination of the mechanism of action of two pre-quit pharmacotherapies for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Stuart G Ferguson; Julia A E Walters; Wenying Lu; Gudrun P Wells; Natalie Schüz
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.