Rebecca L Ashare1, E Paul Wileyto, Kenneth A Perkins, Robert A Schnoll. 1. From the Department of Psychiatry (RLA and RAS), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (EPW) and Abramson Cancer Center (RAS), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and Department of Psychiatry (KAP), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: There is a critical need for the development of novel treatments for nicotine dependence. Because the majority of smokers who make a quit attempt fail within 7 days, medication screening procedures that focus on this early cessation period may provide an indicator of treatment efficacy. To establish the clinical validity of this paradigm, it is critical to demonstrate the association of early abstinence with longer-term abstinence. We tested the number of days of abstinence during the first week after the target quit date (TQD) as a predictor of point prevalence abstinence in 3 independent pharmacotherapy trials for nicotine dependence. METHODS: This was a secondary data analysis of 3 randomized clinical trials: a placebo-controlled trial of transdermal nicotine (N = 545); an open-label nicotine replacement therapy (patch vs spray) trial (N = 566); and a bupropion placebo-controlled trial (N = 538). In separate logistic regression models, the maximum number of consecutive days of abstinence during the first week after the TQD was used to predict biochemically verified 7-day point prevalence abstinence at the end of treatment (EOT) and 6 months post-TQD. RESULTS: Across the 3 trials, the number of days of abstinence significantly predicted abstinence at EOT and 6 months (odds ratios > 1.4; Ps < 0.0001). Likewise, not having any lapse during the first week predicted abstinence at EOT and 6 months (odds ratios > 4.7; Ps < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The first week of abstinence was highly predictive of EOT and long-term abstinence. Medication screening procedures that focus on this early abstinence period (ie, 6 or 7 days of consecutive abstinence) represent a valid tool for assessing the presence of a signal for medication efficacy.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: There is a critical need for the development of novel treatments for nicotine dependence. Because the majority of smokers who make a quit attempt fail within 7 days, medication screening procedures that focus on this early cessation period may provide an indicator of treatment efficacy. To establish the clinical validity of this paradigm, it is critical to demonstrate the association of early abstinence with longer-term abstinence. We tested the number of days of abstinence during the first week after the target quit date (TQD) as a predictor of point prevalence abstinence in 3 independent pharmacotherapy trials for nicotine dependence. METHODS: This was a secondary data analysis of 3 randomized clinical trials: a placebo-controlled trial of transdermal nicotine (N = 545); an open-label nicotine replacement therapy (patch vs spray) trial (N = 566); and a bupropion placebo-controlled trial (N = 538). In separate logistic regression models, the maximum number of consecutive days of abstinence during the first week after the TQD was used to predict biochemically verified 7-day point prevalence abstinence at the end of treatment (EOT) and 6 months post-TQD. RESULTS: Across the 3 trials, the number of days of abstinence significantly predicted abstinence at EOT and 6 months (odds ratios > 1.4; Ps < 0.0001). Likewise, not having any lapse during the first week predicted abstinence at EOT and 6 months (odds ratios > 4.7; Ps < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The first week of abstinence was highly predictive of EOT and long-term abstinence. Medication screening procedures that focus on this early abstinence period (ie, 6 or 7 days of consecutive abstinence) represent a valid tool for assessing the presence of a signal for medication efficacy.
Authors: Paul Wileyto; Freda Patterson; Raymond Niaura; Leonard Epstein; Richard Brown; Janet Audrain-McGovern; Larry Hawk; Caryn Lerman; Freda Patterson Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: James Loughead; E Paul Wileyto; Kosha Ruparel; Mary Falcone; Ryan Hopson; Ruben Gur; Caryn Lerman Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Meghan J Chenoweth; Robert A Schnoll; Maria Novalen; Larry W Hawk; Tony P George; Paul M Cinciripini; Caryn Lerman; Rachel F Tyndale Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Larry W Hawk; Rebecca L Ashare; Jessica D Rhodes; Jason A Oliver; Kenneth Michael Cummings; Martin C Mahoney Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Amanda R Mathew; Bryan W Heckman; Brett Froeliger; Michael E Saladin; Richard A Brown; Brian Hitsman; Matthew J Carpenter Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2018-12-27 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Mary Falcone; Leah Bernardo; E Paul Wileyto; Cheyenne Allenby; Anne Marie Burke; Roy Hamilton; Mario Cristancho; Rebecca L Ashare; James Loughead; Caryn Lerman Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Krysten W Bold; Allen Zweben; Lisa M Fucito; Mary E Piepmeier; Srinivas Muvvala; Ran Wu; Ralitza Gueorguieva; Stephanie S O'Malley Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Richard A Brown; Kathleen M Palm Reed; Erika Litvin Bloom; Haruka Minami; David R Strong; Carl W Lejuez; Michael J Zvolensky; Steven C Hayes Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2018-06