Literature DB >> 19842808

Fast method for psychophysical tuning curve measurement in school-age children.

Alicja N Malicka1, Kevin J Munro, Richard J Baker.   

Abstract

The 'fast' method for measuring psychophysical tuning curves (PTC) uses a masker that sweeps across frequency and a Békésy threshold tracking procedure. The fast-PTC procedure has been recommended as a technique for diagnosing cochlear dead regions in adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the fast-PTC procedure in children. Twelve normal-hearing children (7-10 years old) and five adults were tested. The fast-PTCs were measured for 1000 and 4000 Hz signals using ascending and descending masker sweeps. Measurements were repeated on a separate day to assess test-retest variability. All children were able to perform the task; however it was possible to define the tip in only 87% of the fast-PTCs. Although the variability in tip frequency was higher for children, the mean difference between children and adults was not statistically significant. As expected, the difference on retest was higher for children. Studies investigating the use of the fast-PTC procedure with hearing-impaired children are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19842808     DOI: 10.1080/14992020902845899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  10 in total

1.  Using the auditory steady state response to record response amplitude curves. A possible fast objective method for diagnosing dead regions.

Authors:  Timothy Wilding; Colette McKay; Richard Baker; Terence Picton; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the auditory filter.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

4.  Rapid estimation of high-parameter auditory-filter shapes.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Rajeswari Sivakumar; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Toward Routine Assessments of Auditory Filter Shape.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Allison B Kern; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Time-efficient measures of auditory frequency selectivity.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 7.  Spectral Resolution Development in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants: A Review of Behavioral Studies.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg; David L Horn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.674

8.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  An objective assessment method for frequency selectivity of the human auditory system.

Authors:  Qin Gong; Yao Wang; Meng Xian
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  The influence of probe level on the tuning of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions and behavioral test in human.

Authors:  Yao Wang; Qin Gong; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.819

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.