Literature DB >> 19841952

Effect of oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography on emergency department length of stay.

Jeremiah D Schuur1, Grant Chu, Andrew Sucov.   

Abstract

Computed tomography of the abdomen and/or pelvis (CTAP) is frequently used in the emergency department (ED) allowing diagnosis of a variety of conditions, but requiring a prolonged period of preparation. To determine whether not requiring oral contrast for CTAP reduces ED length of stay (LOS). Retrospective cohort of adult patients visiting an academic ED over 13 weeks around a radiology protocol change. Before the change, many CTAPs required oral contrast; thereafter, oral contrast was not required. LOS was compared before and after the change among all adult ED patients. Among patients undergoing CTAP, adjusted LOS and time to CTAP were compared using multivariate linear regression. 20,464 adult ED visits occurred over the study period, including 1,806 where a CTAP was performed. Oral contrast usage decreased from 42.5% of CTAP to 12.2% (difference 30.3%, 95% confidence interval 38.7% to 46.3%). There was no change in LOS among all ED visits. Among ED visits where a CTAP was performed, median time to CTAP decreased by 27 min and median LOS decreased by 30 min. Adjusted LOS decreased from 324 min (312-337) to 297 min (285-309). Not routinely requiring oral contrast for CTAP in the ED is associated with a half-hour reduction in LOS among all patients undergoing CTAP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19841952     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-009-0847-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  24 in total

Review 1.  Does ambulance diversion matter?

Authors:  Brent R Asplin
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  The use of abdominal computed tomography in older ED patients with acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  Fredric M Hustey; Stephen W Meldon; Gerald A Banet; Lowell W Gerson; Michelle Blanda; Lawrence M Lewis
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material.

Authors:  Sandra Mun; Randy D Ernst; Kevin Chen; Aytekin Oto; Shree Shah; William J Mileski
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2005-12-17

Review 4.  Multidetector CT evaluation of abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Lisa A Miller; K Shanmuganathan
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Scanning techniques in computed body tomography.

Authors:  R H Kirkpatrick; J Wittenberg; D L Schaffer; E B Black; D A Hall; B S Braitman; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Positive and negative contrast agents in CT evaluation of the abdomen and pelvis.

Authors:  D J Hamlin; F A Burgener
Journal:  J Comput Tomogr       Date:  1981-06

Review 7.  Progress in the use of helical CT for imaging urinary calculi.

Authors:  James C Williams; Samuel C Kim; Chad A Zarse; James A McAteer; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 8.  Imaging for kidney stones.

Authors:  P N Rao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Use of diagnostic testing in the emergency department for patients presenting with non-traumatic abdominal pain.

Authors:  J Tobias Nagurney; David F M Brown; Yuchiao Chang; Swati Sane; Andrew C Wang; Justin B Weiner
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.484

10.  Impact of helical computed tomography on the outcomes of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Sam S Torbati; David A Guss
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.451

View more
  6 in total

1.  Is there an association between radiologist turnaround time of emergency department abdominal CT studies and radiologic report quality?

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; John A Bonavita; Mark P Foran; Brent W Matza; John M McMenamy
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-10-03

Review 2.  Oral contrast for CT in patients with acute non-traumatic abdominal and pelvic pain: what should be its current role?

Authors:  Ania Z Kielar; Michael N Patlas; Douglas S Katz
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-05-11

3.  Eliminating routine oral contrast use for CT in the emergency department: impact on patient throughput and diagnosis.

Authors:  Robin B Levenson; Marc A Camacho; Erin Horn; Amina Saghir; Daniel McGillicuddy; Leon D Sanchez
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-06-29

4.  Oral Contrast is no Longer Needed.

Authors:  Egbert Knöpfle
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  The impact of introducing a no oral contrast abdominopelvic CT examination (NOCAPE) pathway on radiology turn around times, emergency department length of stay, and patient safety.

Authors:  Seyed Amirhossein Razavi; Jamlik-Omari Johnson; Michael T Kassin; Kimberly E Applegate
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-06-06

6.  Does limiting oral contrast decrease emergency department length of stay?

Authors:  Christy L Hopkins; Troy Madsen; Zachary Foy; Michielle Reina; Erik Barton
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.