Literature DB >> 6791875

Positive and negative contrast agents in CT evaluation of the abdomen and pelvis.

D J Hamlin, F A Burgener.   

Abstract

The oral administration of a dilute positive iodinated contrast agent such as 2% Gastrografin is usually necessary to achieve optimal delineation of abdominal and pelvic organs. The amount of contrast agent administered and the timing of its administration depends on the site of suspected disease within the body. The simultaneous administration of antiperistaltic agents intravenously is generally unnecessary when utilizing the modern fast CT scanners. However, contrast agent-induced artifact may at times be troublesome, and we therefore suggest that lesions in the left lobe of the liver be scanned without positive contrast in the stomach. Negative contrast may also be useful in delineating disease: gas (carbon dioxide) has been shown to be useful in evaluating bladder tumors. We have also used air insufflation to facilitate the evaluation of small rectal tumors. Intravenous administration of contrast agent aids characterization of various disease entities and also facilitates the recognition of vascular structures (such as veins and arteries in the peripancreatic region). In our opinion both the infusion and bolus modes of contrast material administration have their place in the evaluation of abdominal and pelvic lesions by computed tomography. Newer techniques such as dynamic CT scanning will probably prove to be valuable both in delineating and characterizing disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6791875     DOI: 10.1016/0149-936x(81)90020-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 0149-936X


  5 in total

Review 1.  Oral contrast for CT in patients with acute non-traumatic abdominal and pelvic pain: what should be its current role?

Authors:  Ania Z Kielar; Michael N Patlas; Douglas S Katz
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-05-11

Review 2.  Use of positive oral contrast agents in abdominopelvic computed tomography for blunt abdominal injury: meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Chau Hung Lee; Benjamin Haaland; Arul Earnest; Cher Heng Tan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Utility of CT oral contrast administration in the emergency department of a quaternary oncology hospital: diagnostic implications, turnaround times, and assessment of ED physician ordering.

Authors:  Corey T Jensen; Katherine J Blair; Ott Le; Jia Sun; Wei Wei; Brinda Rao Korivi; Ajaykumar C Morani; Nicolaus A Wagner-Bartak
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-11

4.  Patient encounter time intervals in the evaluation of emergency department patients requiring abdominopelvic CT: oral contrast versus no contrast.

Authors:  Ly N Huynh; Bret F Coughlin; Jeannette Wolfe; Fidela Blank; Steve Y Lee; Howard A Smithline
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2004-05-29

5.  Effect of oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography on emergency department length of stay.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Schuur; Grant Chu; Andrew Sucov
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-10-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.