Literature DB >> 33650081

Predicting treatment response to mandibular advancement therapy using a titratable thermoplastic device.

Wojciech Trzepizur1,2,3, Benjamin Adrian4, Marc Le Vaillant5, Nicole Meslier6,4, Jean-Daniel Kün-Darbois7, Frédéric Gagnadoux6,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Mandibular advancement device (MAD) therapy is the most commonly used second-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but MAD may be ineffective in a subgroup of patients. We describe the use of a trial of a titratable thermoplastic MAD to predict treatment outcomes with a custom-made MAD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with a thermoplastic MAD as a trial before custom-made MAD manufacturing were included in the study. Sleep recordings and clinical outcomes assessed after 6 months of treatment with each device were compared. Predictive utility of thermoplastic MAD to identify custom-made MAD treatment success defined as a reduction greater than 50% and final apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) less than 10 events/h was evaluated.
RESULTS: Thermoplastic MADs were installed in 111 patients, but only 36 patients were finally treated with both devices and were included in the analysis. A significant correlation was observed between the impact of the two devices on the AHI (r=0.85, p<0.0001), oxygen desaturation index (r=0.73, p<0.0001), snoring index (r=0.85, p<0.0001), and Epworth sleepiness scale (r=0.77, p<0.0001). A high positive predictive value (86%) but a low negative predictive value (46%) was observed regarding AHI decrease.
CONCLUSIONS: Similar impacts of both MADs were observed on major OSA severity markers and symptoms. The ability of thermoplastic MAD to indicate likelihood of success with custom-made MAD will require further controlled studies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Thermoplastic MADs could represent a useful and easily implemented tool to predict the likelihood of success of a custom-made MAD as treatment for OSA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Custom-made mandibular advancement device; Sleep apnea; Thermoplastic mandibular advancement device

Year:  2021        PMID: 33650081     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03865-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  22 in total

1.  Effects of CPAP and mandibular advancement device treatment in obstructive sleep apnea patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martha Schwartz; Luis Acosta; Yuan-Lung Hung; Mariela Padilla; Reyes Enciso
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Comparison of titrable thermoplastic versus custom-made mandibular advancement device for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  Frédéric Gagnadoux; Xuan-Lan Nguyen; Marc Le Vaillant; Pascaline Priou; Nicole Meslier; Audrey Eberlein; Jean-Daniel Kun-Darbois; Cyril Chaufton; Bruno Villiers; Maguy Levy; Wojciech Trzépizur; Sandrine Launois
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.415

3.  Health outcomes of continuous positive airway pressure versus oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Craig L Phillips; Ronald R Grunstein; M Ali Darendeliler; Anastasia S Mihailidou; Vasantha K Srinivasan; Brendon J Yee; Guy B Marks; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Heat-moulded versus custom-made mandibular advancement devices for obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Jean Louis Pépin; Nathalie Raymond; Olivier Lacaze; Nathalie Aisenberg; Jérôme Forcioli; Eric Bonte; Arnaud Bourdin; Sandrine Launois; Renaud Tamisier; Nicolas Molinari
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Oropharyngeal crowding and obesity as predictors of oral appliance treatment response to moderate obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Satoru Tsuiki; Eiki Ito; Shiroh Isono; C Frank Ryan; Yoko Komada; Masato Matsuura; Yuichi Inoue
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale.

Authors:  M W Johns
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 7.  Prediction of oral appliance treatment outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kentaro Okuno; Benjamin T Pliska; Mona Hamoda; Alan A Lowe; Fernanda R Almeida
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 11.609

8.  Titrated mandibular advancement versus positive airway pressure for sleep apnoea.

Authors:  F Gagnadoux; B Fleury; B Vielle; B Pételle; N Meslier; X L N'Guyen; W Trzepizur; J L Racineux
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 9.  Oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: an update.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Olivier M Vanderveken; Hiroko Tsuda; Marie Marklund; Frederic Gagnadoux; Clete A Kushida; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 4.062

10.  Influence of marital status and employment status on long-term adherence with continuous positive airway pressure in sleep apnea patients.

Authors:  Frédéric Gagnadoux; Marc Le Vaillant; François Goupil; Thierry Pigeanne; Sylvaine Chollet; Philippe Masson; Marie-Pierre Humeau; Acya Bizieux-Thaminy; Nicole Meslier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.