Yoshikazu Takaesu1, Satoru Tsuiki2,3,4, Mina Kobayashi2,3, Yoko Komada2,5,3, Hideaki Nakayama6, Yuichi Inoue2,5,3. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Japan Somnology Center, Institute of Neuropsychiatry, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Foundation of Sleep and Health Sciences, Tokyo, Japan. 4. Aging and Geriatric Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan. 5. Department of Somnology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan. 6. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Positional obstructive sleep apnea (P-OSA) is a clinically common phenotype of OSA, which can be treated effectively with mandibular advancement devices (MADs). We hypothesized that the efficacy of an MAD is comparable to that of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in P-OSA patients. METHODS: Among patients diagnosed with OSA at a single sleep center from January 2008 to May 2014, male subjects with moderate OSA were recruited and stringently categorized as having P-OSA when the ratio of their lateral apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) to supine AHI was ≤ 0.5, their lateral sleep time was > 60 minutes, and their lateral REM sleep time was longer than 10 minutes. Treatment efficacy was compared between P-OSA subjects with an MAD (n = 34) and those with nCPAP (n = 34) after matching for age, body-mass index, and baseline AHI. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline AHI (MAD: nCPAP = 20.6 ± 3.9/h: 21.3 ± 1.7/h, p = 0.35) or in follow-up AHI (MAD: nCPAP = 4.7 ± 3.5/h: 3.4 ± 3.7/h, p = 0.12) between the 2 treatment groups, and hence MADs lowered the AHI to the same extent as nCPAP. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that an MAD is as efficacious as nCPAP for P-OSA patients. MAD treatment for this specific phenotype may be a promising patient-tailored and first-line approach to OSA. COMMENTARY: A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 1079.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Positional obstructive sleep apnea (P-OSA) is a clinically common phenotype of OSA, which can be treated effectively with mandibular advancement devices (MADs). We hypothesized that the efficacy of an MAD is comparable to that of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in P-OSA patients. METHODS: Among patients diagnosed with OSA at a single sleep center from January 2008 to May 2014, male subjects with moderate OSA were recruited and stringently categorized as having P-OSA when the ratio of their lateral apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) to supine AHI was ≤ 0.5, their lateral sleep time was > 60 minutes, and their lateral REM sleep time was longer than 10 minutes. Treatment efficacy was compared between P-OSA subjects with an MAD (n = 34) and those with nCPAP (n = 34) after matching for age, body-mass index, and baseline AHI. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline AHI (MAD: nCPAP = 20.6 ± 3.9/h: 21.3 ± 1.7/h, p = 0.35) or in follow-up AHI (MAD: nCPAP = 4.7 ± 3.5/h: 3.4 ± 3.7/h, p = 0.12) between the 2 treatment groups, and hence MADs lowered the AHI to the same extent as nCPAP. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that an MAD is as efficacious as nCPAP for P-OSA patients. MAD treatment for this specific phenotype may be a promising patient-tailored and first-line approach to OSA. COMMENTARY: A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 1079.
Authors: Jin Woo Chung; Reyes Enciso; Daniel J Levendowski; Todd D Morgan; Philip R Westbrook; Glenn T Clark Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Date: 2010-03-17
Authors: Clete A Kushida; Timothy I Morgenthaler; Michael R Littner; Cathy A Alessi; Dennis Bailey; Jack Coleman; Leah Friedman; Max Hirshkowitz; Sheldon Kapen; Milton Kramer; Teofilo Lee-Chiong; Judith Owens; Jeffrey P Pancer Journal: Sleep Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Linda Sharples; Matthew Glover; Abigail Clutterbuck-James; Maxine Bennett; Jake Jordan; Rebecca Chadwick; Marcus Pittman; Clare East; Malcolm Cameron; Mike Davies; Nick Oscroft; Ian Smith; Mary Morrell; Julia Fox-Rushby; Timothy Quinnell Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Sean M Caples; W McDowell Anderson; Karel Calero; Michael Howell; Sarah D Hashmi Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 4.324
Authors: P Mayoral Sanz; M Garcia Reyes; A Bataller Torras; J A Cabrera Castillo; M O Lagravère Vich Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: David Kent; Jeffrey Stanley; R Nisha Aurora; Corinna G Levine; Daniel J Gottlieb; Matthew D Spann; Carlos A Torre; Katherine Green; Christopher G Harrod Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 4.062