Literature DB >> 19837592

Protein-protein interaction networks: how can a hub protein bind so many different partners?

Chung-Jung Tsai1, Buyong Ma, Ruth Nussinov.   

Abstract

How can a single hub protein bind so many different partners? Numerous studies have sought differences between hubs and non-hubs to explain what makes a protein a hub and how a shared hub-binding site can be promiscuous, yet at the same time be specific. Here, we suggest that the problem is largely non-existent and resides in the popular representation of protein interaction networks: protein products derived from a single gene, even if different, are clustered in maps into a single node. This leads to the impression that a single protein binds to a very large number of partners. In reality, it does not; rather, protein networks reflect the combination of multiple proteins, each with a distinct conformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19837592      PMCID: PMC7292551          DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci        ISSN: 0968-0004            Impact factor:   13.807


  55 in total

1.  Emergence of scaling in random networks

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Structure of the Tfb1/p53 complex: Insights into the interaction between the p62/Tfb1 subunit of TFIIH and the activation domain of p53.

Authors:  Paola Di Lello; Lisa M Miller Jenkins; Tamara N Jones; Bao D Nguyen; Toshiaki Hara; Hiroshi Yamaguchi; Jimmy D Dikeakos; Ettore Appella; Pascale Legault; James G Omichinski
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Structural basis of Dscam isoform specificity.

Authors:  Rob Meijers; Roland Puettmann-Holgado; Georgios Skiniotis; Jin-huan Liu; Thomas Walz; Jia-huai Wang; Dietmar Schmucker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Creative elements: network-based predictions of active centres in proteins and cellular and social networks.

Authors:  Peter Csermely
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 5.  The molecular sociology of the cell.

Authors:  Carol V Robinson; Andrej Sali; Wolfgang Baumeister
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Dynamic complex formation during the yeast cell cycle.

Authors:  Ulrik de Lichtenberg; Lars Juhl Jensen; Søren Brunak; Peer Bork
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Synonymous mutations and ribosome stalling can lead to altered folding pathways and distinct minima.

Authors:  Chung-Jung Tsai; Zuben E Sauna; Chava Kimchi-Sarfaty; Suresh V Ambudkar; Michael M Gottesman; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Refocusing on BRCA1.

Authors:  Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  Intrinsic disorder is a common feature of hub proteins from four eukaryotic interactomes.

Authors:  Chad Haynes; Christopher J Oldfield; Fei Ji; Niels Klitgord; Michael E Cusick; Predrag Radivojac; Vladimir N Uversky; Marc Vidal; Lilia M Iakoucheva
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Toward accurate reconstruction of functional protein networks.

Authors:  Nir Yosef; Lior Ungar; Einat Zalckvar; Adi Kimchi; Martin Kupiec; Eytan Ruppin; Roded Sharan
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  54 in total

Review 1.  Protein binding specificity versus promiscuity.

Authors:  Gideon Schreiber; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  Domain distribution and intrinsic disorder in hubs in the human protein-protein interaction network.

Authors:  Ashwini Patil; Kengo Kinoshita; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Energy landscape investigation by wavelet transform analysis of atomic force spectroscopy data in a biorecognition experiment.

Authors:  Anna Rita Bizzarri
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 1.365

4.  Disparate degrees of hypervariable loop flexibility control T-cell receptor cross-reactivity, specificity, and binding mechanism.

Authors:  Daniel R Scott; Oleg Y Borbulevych; Kurt H Piepenbrink; Steven A Corcelli; Brian M Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Connectedness of PPI network neighborhoods identifies regulatory hub proteins.

Authors:  Andrew D Fox; Benjamin J Hescott; Anselm C Blumer; Donna K Slonim
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Expanding the proteome: disordered and alternatively folded proteins.

Authors:  H Jane Dyson
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.318

7.  Local and global anatomy of antibody-protein antigen recognition.

Authors:  Meryl Wang; David Zhu; Jianwei Zhu; Ruth Nussinov; Buyong Ma
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.137

8.  Construction and application of a protein interaction map for white spot syndrome virus (WSSV).

Authors:  Pakkakul Sangsuriya; Jiun-Yan Huang; Yu-Fei Chu; Kornsunee Phiwsaiya; Pimlapas Leekitcharoenphon; Watcharachai Meemetta; Saengchan Senapin; Wei-Pang Huang; Boonsirm Withyachumnarnkul; Timothy W Flegel; Chu-Fang Lo
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Test and Evaluation of ff99IDPs Force Field for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  Wei Ye; Dingjue Ji; Wei Wang; Ray Luo; Hai-Feng Chen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Dipeptide analysis of p53 mutations and evolution of p53 family proteins.

Authors:  Qiang Huang; Long Yu; Arnold J Levine; Ruth Nussinov; Buyong Ma
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.