Literature DB >> 19836411

Inferring crossbridge properties from skeletal muscle energetics.

C J Barclay1, R C Woledge, N A Curtin.   

Abstract

Work is generated in muscle by myosin crossbridges during their interaction with the actin filament. The energy from which the work is produced is the free energy change of ATP hydrolysis and efficiency quantifies the fraction of the energy supplied that is converted into work. The purpose of this review is to compare the efficiency of frog skeletal muscle determined from measurements of work output and either heat production or chemical breakdown with the work produced per crossbridge cycle predicted on the basis of the mechanical responses of contracting muscle to rapid length perturbations. We review the literature to establish the likely maximum crossbridge efficiency for frog skeletal muscle (0.4) and, using this value, calculate the maximum work a crossbridge can perform in a single attachment to actin (33 x 10(-21) J). To see whether this amount of work is consistent with our understanding of crossbridge mechanics, we examine measurements of the force responses of frog muscle to fast length perturbations and, taking account of filament compliance, determine the crossbridge force-extension relationship and the velocity dependences of the fraction of crossbridges attached and average crossbridge strain. These data are used in combination with a Huxley-Simmons-type model of the thermodynamics of the attached crossbridge to determine whether this type of model can adequately account for the observed muscle efficiency. Although it is apparent that there are still deficiencies in our understanding of how to accurately model some aspects of ensemble crossbridge behaviour, this comparison shows that crossbridge energetics are consistent with known crossbridge properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19836411     DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2009.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol        ISSN: 0079-6107            Impact factor:   3.667


  39 in total

1.  Roger C. Woledge 1938-2015.

Authors:  Chris Barclay; Nancy Curtin
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  The non-linear elasticity of the muscle sarcomere and the compliance of myosin motors.

Authors:  Luca Fusi; Elisabetta Brunello; Massimo Reconditi; Gabriella Piazzesi; Vincenzo Lombardi
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Experimental basis of the hypotheses on the mechanism of skeletal muscle contraction.

Authors:  Enrico Grazi
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2012-02-15

4.  A cross-bridge cycle with two tension-generating steps simulates skeletal muscle mechanics.

Authors:  Gerald Offer; K W Ranatunga
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Efficiency and cross-bridge work output of skeletal muscle is decreased at low levels of activation.

Authors:  D B Lewis; C J Barclay
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 6.  High efficiency in human muscle: an anomaly and an opportunity?

Authors:  Frank E Nelson; Justus D Ortega; Sharon A Jubrias; Kevin E Conley; Martin J Kushmerick
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Achilles tendon strain energy in distance running: consider the muscle energy cost.

Authors:  Jared R Fletcher; Brian R MacIntosh
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-11-13

8.  Is the efficiency of mammalian (mouse) skeletal muscle temperature dependent?

Authors:  C J Barclay; R C Woledge; N A Curtin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Interventricular comparison of the energetics of contraction of trabeculae carneae isolated from the rat heart.

Authors:  June-Chiew Han; Andrew J Taberner; Poul M F Nielsen; Denis S Loiselle
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  Energetics of muscle contraction: further trials.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Yamada
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.