Literature DB >> 19829295

Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences.

Ryan Lister1, Mattia Pelizzola, Robert H Dowen, R David Hawkins, Gary Hon, Julian Tonti-Filippini, Joseph R Nery, Leonard Lee, Zhen Ye, Que-Minh Ngo, Lee Edsall, Jessica Antosiewicz-Bourget, Ron Stewart, Victor Ruotti, A Harvey Millar, James A Thomson, Bing Ren, Joseph R Ecker.   

Abstract

DNA cytosine methylation is a central epigenetic modification that has essential roles in cellular processes including genome regulation, development and disease. Here we present the first genome-wide, single-base-resolution maps of methylated cytosines in a mammalian genome, from both human embryonic stem cells and fetal fibroblasts, along with comparative analysis of messenger RNA and small RNA components of the transcriptome, several histone modifications, and sites of DNA-protein interaction for several key regulatory factors. Widespread differences were identified in the composition and patterning of cytosine methylation between the two genomes. Nearly one-quarter of all methylation identified in embryonic stem cells was in a non-CG context, suggesting that embryonic stem cells may use different methylation mechanisms to affect gene regulation. Methylation in non-CG contexts showed enrichment in gene bodies and depletion in protein binding sites and enhancers. Non-CG methylation disappeared upon induced differentiation of the embryonic stem cells, and was restored in induced pluripotent stem cells. We identified hundreds of differentially methylated regions proximal to genes involved in pluripotency and differentiation, and widespread reduced methylation levels in fibroblasts associated with lower transcriptional activity. These reference epigenomes provide a foundation for future studies exploring this key epigenetic modification in human disease and development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19829295      PMCID: PMC2857523          DOI: 10.1038/nature08514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  46 in total

1.  Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene.

Authors:  A C Bell; G Felsenfeld
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus.

Authors:  A T Hark; C J Schoenherr; D J Katz; R S Ingram; J M Levorse; S M Tilghman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Distinct DNA methylation patterns characterize differentiated human embryonic stem cells and developing human fetal liver.

Authors:  Alayne L Brunner; David S Johnson; Si Wan Kim; Anton Valouev; Timothy E Reddy; Norma F Neff; Elizabeth Anton; Catherine Medina; Loan Nguyen; Eric Chiao; Chuba B Oyolu; Gary P Schroth; Devin M Absher; Julie C Baker; Richard M Myers
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Non-CpG methylation is prevalent in embryonic stem cells and may be mediated by DNA methyltransferase 3a.

Authors:  B H Ramsahoye; D Biniszkiewicz; F Lyko; V Clark; A P Bird; R Jaenisch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Enzymatic properties of recombinant Dnmt3a DNA methyltransferase from mouse: the enzyme modifies DNA in a non-processive manner and also methylates non-CpG [correction of non-CpA] sites.

Authors:  H Gowher; A Jeltsch
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-06-22       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development.

Authors:  M Okano; D W Bell; D A Haber; E Li
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-10-29       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Enzymatic properties of de novo-type mouse DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases.

Authors:  A Aoki; I Suetake; J Miyagawa; T Fujio; T Chijiwa; H Sasaki; S Tajima
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  The DNA methyltransferases of mammals.

Authors:  T H Bestor
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Lineage-specific DNA methylation in T cells correlates with histone methylation and enhancer activity.

Authors:  Christian Schmidl; Maja Klug; Tina J Boeld; Reinhard Andreesen; Petra Hoffmann; Matthias Edinger; Michael Rehli
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Cole Trapnell; Mihai Pop; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  1961 in total

1.  DNA methylation screening and analysis.

Authors:  Karilyn E Sant; Muna S Nahar; Dana C Dolinoy
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

2.  Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells.

Authors:  R David Hawkins; Gary C Hon; Leonard K Lee; Queminh Ngo; Ryan Lister; Mattia Pelizzola; Lee E Edsall; Samantha Kuan; Ying Luu; Sarit Klugman; Jessica Antosiewicz-Bourget; Zhen Ye; Celso Espinoza; Saurabh Agarwahl; Li Shen; Victor Ruotti; Wei Wang; Ron Stewart; James A Thomson; Joseph R Ecker; Bing Ren
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 24.633

3.  Identification of epigenetic DNA modifications with a protein nanopore.

Authors:  Emma V B Wallace; David Stoddart; Andrew J Heron; Ellina Mikhailova; Giovanni Maglia; Timothy J Donohoe; Hagan Bayley
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 4.  Identification of driver and passenger DNA methylation in cancer by epigenomic analysis.

Authors:  Satish Kalari; Gerd P Pfeifer
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.944

Review 5.  Stress and the epigenetic landscape: a link to the pathobiology of human diseases?

Authors:  Sarah E Johnstone; Stephen B Baylin
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Temporal uncoupling of the DNA methylome and transcriptional repression during embryogenesis.

Authors:  Ozren Bogdanovic; Steven W Long; Simon J van Heeringen; Arie B Brinkman; Jose Luis Gómez-Skarmeta; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Peter L Jones; Gert Jan C Veenstra
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 7.  Detecting and interpreting DNA methylation marks.

Authors:  Ren Ren; John R Horton; Xing Zhang; Robert M Blumenthal; Xiaodong Cheng
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  Linking inter-individual variability to endocrine disruptors: insights for epigenetic inheritance.

Authors:  Sarah E Latchney; Ashley M Fields; Martha Susiarjo
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  Induced pluripotent mesenchymal stromal cell clones retain donor-derived differences in DNA methylation profiles.

Authors:  Kaifeng Shao; Carmen Koch; Manoj K Gupta; Qiong Lin; Michael Lenz; Stephanie Laufs; Bernd Denecke; Manfred Schmidt; Matthias Linke; Hans C Hennies; Jürgen Hescheler; Martin Zenke; Ulrich Zechner; Tomo Šarić; Wolfgang Wagner
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 11.454

10.  How has the study of the human placenta aided our understanding of partially methylated genes?

Authors:  Diane I Schroeder; Janine M LaSalle
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.