Literature DB >> 19828192

Surface characterization of extracellular matrix scaffolds.

Bryan N Brown1, Christopher A Barnes, Rena T Kasick, Roger Michel, Thomas W Gilbert, Donna Beer-Stolz, David G Castner, Buddy D Ratner, Stephen F Badylak.   

Abstract

Extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds prepared from different tissue sources or using different methods have been demonstrated to have distinctive effects upon cell adhesion patterns and the ability to support and maintain differentiated phenotypes. It is unknown whether the molecular composition or the ultrastructure of the ECM plays a greater role in determining the phenotype of the cells with which it comes into contact. However, when implanted, the topology and ligand landscape of the material will determine the host molecules that bind and the type and behavior of cells that mediate the host response. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of surface characteristics is essential in the design of scaffolds for specific clinical applications. The surface characteristics of ECM scaffolds derived from porcine urinary bladder, small intestine, and liver as well as the effects of two commonly used methods of chemical cross-linking upon UBM were investigated. Electron microscopy and time of flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy were used to examine the surface characteristics of the scaffolds. The results show that ECM scaffolds have unique morphologic and structural properties which are dependant on the organ or tissue from which the scaffold is harvested. Furthermore, the results show that the surface characteristics of an ECM scaffold are changed through chemical cross-linking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19828192      PMCID: PMC2783670          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  58 in total

1.  Reconstructive urethroplasty using porcine acellular matrix.

Authors:  Franco Mantovani; Alberto Trinchieri; Chiara Castelnuovo; Ai Ling Romanò; Enrico Pisani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Cell-type-specific adhesion onto polymer surfaces from mixed cell populations.

Authors:  Robin A Quirk; Barrie Kellam; Rena N Bhandari; Martyn C Davies; Saul J B Tendler; Kevin M Shakesheff
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2003-03-05       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Assessing porcine liver-derived biomatrix for hepatic tissue engineering.

Authors:  Paul Lin; Warren C W Chan; Stephen F Badylak; Sangeeta N Bhatia
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

Review 4.  Cell responses to the mechanochemical microenvironment--implications for regenerative medicine and drug delivery.

Authors:  Florian Rehfeldt; Adam J Engler; Adam Eckhardt; Fariyal Ahmed; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  Macrophage phenotype as a determinant of biologic scaffold remodeling.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak; Jolene E Valentin; Anjani K Ravindra; George P McCabe; Ann M Stewart-Akers
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Micromechanical control of cell and tissue development: implications for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Kaustabh Ghosh; Donald E Ingber
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 15.470

7.  Biological vascularized matrix for bladder tissue engineering: matrix preparation, reseeding technique and short-term implantation in a porcine model.

Authors:  Dirk Schultheiss; Alexander I Gabouev; Serghei Cebotari; Igor Tudorache; Thorsten Walles; Norbert Schlote; Jörg Wefer; P Matthias Kaufmann; Axel Haverich; Udo Jonas; Christian G Stief; Heike Mertsching
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating.

Authors:  Adam J Engler; Christine Carag-Krieger; Colin P Johnson; Matthew Raab; Hsin-Yao Tang; David W Speicher; Joseph W Sanger; Jean M Sanger; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Impact of polymer hydrophilicity on biocompatibility: implication for DES polymer design.

Authors:  Ayala Hezi-Yamit; Carol Sullivan; Jennifer Wong; Laura David; Mingfei Chen; Peiwen Cheng; David Shumaker; Josiah N Wilcox; Kishore Udipi
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Biaxial strength of multilaminated extracellular matrix scaffolds.

Authors:  Donald O Freytes; Stephen F Badylak; Thomas J Webster; Leslie A Geddes; Ann E Rundell
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  42 in total

1.  Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; Ricardo Londono; Stephen Tottey; Li Zhang; Kathryn A Kukla; Matthew T Wolf; Kerry A Daly; Janet E Reing; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Right ventricular outflow tract repair with a cardiac biologic scaffold.

Authors:  John M Wainwright; Ryotaro Hashizume; Kazuro L Fujimoto; Nathaniel T Remlinger; Colin Pesyna; William R Wagner; Kimimasa Tobita; Thomas W Gilbert; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 2.481

3.  Comparison of three methods for the derivation of a biologic scaffold composed of adipose tissue extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; John M Freund; Li Han; J Peter Rubin; Janet E Reing; Eric M Jeffries; Mathew T Wolf; Stephen Tottey; Christopher A Barnes; Buddy D Ratner; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 3.056

4.  Evaluation of the biocompatibility and mechanical properties of xenogeneic (porcine) extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold for pelvic reconstruction.

Authors:  Lubin Liu; Deng Li; Yanzhou Wang; Huicheng Xu; Liangpeng Ge; Zhiqing Liang
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  The effects of processing methods upon mechanical and biologic properties of porcine dermal extracellular matrix scaffolds.

Authors:  Janet E Reing; Bryan N Brown; Kerry A Daly; John M Freund; Thomas W Gilbert; Susan X Hsiong; Alexander Huber; Karen E Kullas; Stephen Tottey; Matthew T Wolf; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  The effect of source animal age upon extracellular matrix scaffold properties.

Authors:  Stephen Tottey; Scott A Johnson; Peter M Crapo; Janet E Reing; Li Zhang; Hongbin Jiang; Christopher J Medberry; Brandon Reines; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Regenerative Medicine Strategies for Esophageal Repair.

Authors:  Ricardo Londono; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 6.389

8.  Quantification of DNA in urinary porcine bladder matrix using the ACTB gene.

Authors:  Erika Silva-Benítez; Eduardo Soto-Sáinz; Amaury Pozos-Guillen; José Geovanni Romero-Quintana; Maribel Aguilar-Medina; Alfredo Ayala-Ham; Eri Peña-Martínez; Rosalío Ramos-Payán; Héctor Flores
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.416

9.  Inductive, scaffold-based, regenerative medicine approach to reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint disk.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; William L Chung; Alejandro J Almarza; Matthew D Pavlick; Serafim N Reppas; Mark W Ochs; Alan J Russell; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 10.  Perspectives on whole-organ assembly: moving toward transplantation on demand.

Authors:  Alejandro Soto-Gutierrez; Jason A Wertheim; Harald C Ott; Thomas W Gilbert
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.