Literature DB >> 20728934

The effects of processing methods upon mechanical and biologic properties of porcine dermal extracellular matrix scaffolds.

Janet E Reing1, Bryan N Brown, Kerry A Daly, John M Freund, Thomas W Gilbert, Susan X Hsiong, Alexander Huber, Karen E Kullas, Stephen Tottey, Matthew T Wolf, Stephen F Badylak.   

Abstract

Biologic materials from various species and tissues are commonly used as surgical meshes or scaffolds for tissue reconstruction. Extracellular matrix (ECM) represents the secreted product of the cells comprising each tissue and organ, and therefore provides a unique biologic material for selected regenerative medicine applications. Minimal disruption of ECM ultrastructure and content during tissue processing is typically desirable. The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate effects of commonly used tissue processing steps upon porcine dermal ECM scaffold composition, mechanical properties, and cytocompatibility. Processing steps evaluated included liming and hot water sanitation, trypsin/SDS/TritonX-100 decellularization, and trypsin/TritonX-100 decellularization. Liming decreased the growth factor and glycosaminoglycan content, the mechanical strength, and the ability of the ECM to support in vitro cell growth (p ≤ 0.05 for all). Hot water sanitation treatment decreased only the growth factor content of the ECM (p ≤ 0.05). Trypsin/SDS/TritonX-100 decellularization decreased the growth factor content and the ability of the ECM to support in vitro cell growth (p ≤ 0.05 for both). Trypsin/Triton X-100 decellularization also decreased the growth factor content of the ECM but increased the ability of the ECM to support in vitro cell growth (p ≤ 0.05 for both). We conclude that processing steps evaluated in the present study affect content, mechanical strength, and/or cytocompatibility of the resultant porcine dermal ECM, and therefore care must be taken in choosing appropriate processing steps to maintain the beneficial effects of ECM in biologic scaffolds.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20728934      PMCID: PMC2956268          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  49 in total

1.  Extracellular matrix bioscaffolds for orthopaedic applications. A comparative histologic study.

Authors:  Jolene E Valentin; John S Badylak; George P McCabe; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Is lamina propria matrix responsible for normal bladder compliance?

Authors:  D H Ewalt; P S Howard; B Blyth; H M Snyder; J W Duckett; R M Levin; E J Macarak
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Macrophage phenotype as a determinant of biologic scaffold remodeling.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak; Jolene E Valentin; Anjani K Ravindra; George P McCabe; Ann M Stewart-Akers
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Freeze drying of cardiac valves in preparation for cellular repopulation.

Authors:  A Curtil; D E Pegg; A Wilson
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.487

5.  Preclinical testing of tissue-engineered heart valves re-endothelialized under simulated physiological conditions.

Authors:  Artur Lichtenberg; Igor Tudorache; Serghei Cebotari; Mark Suprunov; Greta Tudorache; Heidi Goerler; Joon-Keun Park; Denise Hilfiker-Kleiner; Stefanie Ringes-Lichtenberg; Matthias Karck; Gudrun Brandes; Andres Hilfiker; Axel Haverich
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  FGF-2 enhances vascularization for adipose tissue engineering.

Authors:  Kacey G Marra; Alicia J DeFail; Julio A Clavijo-Alvarez; Stephen F Badylak; Aurele Taieb; Bret Schipper; Jennifer Bennett; J Peter Rubin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  Control of angiogenesis by heparin and other sulfated polysaccharides.

Authors:  J Folkman; Y Shing
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Uniaxial and biaxial properties of terminally sterilized porcine urinary bladder matrix scaffolds.

Authors:  Donald O Freytes; Richard M Stoner; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.368

9.  Biaxial strength of multilaminated extracellular matrix scaffolds.

Authors:  Donald O Freytes; Stephen F Badylak; Thomas J Webster; Leslie A Geddes; Ann E Rundell
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 10.  Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.708

View more
  97 in total

1.  Biologic scaffold composed of skeletal muscle extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Matthew T Wolf; Kerry A Daly; Janet E Reing; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Production of decellularized porcine lung scaffolds for use in tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jenna L Balestrini; Ashley L Gard; Angela Liu; Katherine L Leiby; Jonas Schwan; Britta Kunkemoeller; Elizabeth A Calle; Amogh Sivarapatna; Tylee Lin; Sashka Dimitrievska; Stuart G Cambpell; Laura E Niklason
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Engineered microporosity: enhancing the early regenerative potential of decellularized temporomandibular joint discs.

Authors:  Cassandra M Juran; M Franklin Dolwick; Peter S McFetridge
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  Towards the generation of patient-specific patches for cardiac repair.

Authors:  Giancarlo Forte; Stefania Pagliari; Francesca Pagliari; Mitsuhiro Ebara; Paolo Di Nardo; Takao Aoyagi
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.739

5.  Decellularized extracellular matrix derived from porcine adipose tissue as a xenogeneic biomaterial for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Young Chan Choi; Ji Suk Choi; Beob Soo Kim; Jae Dong Kim; Hwa In Yoon; Yong Woo Cho
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 6.  Extracellular matrix as an inductive scaffold for functional tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 7.012

Review 7.  Matricellular proteins and biomaterials.

Authors:  Aaron H Morris; Themis R Kyriakides
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 11.583

8.  Macrophage polarization in response to ECM coated polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  Matthew T Wolf; Christopher L Dearth; Christian A Ranallo; Samuel T LoPresti; Lisa E Carey; Kerry A Daly; Bryan N Brown; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Nitro-Oleic Acid (NO2-OA) Release Enhances Regional Angiogenesis in a Rat Abdominal Wall Defect Model.

Authors:  Antonio D'Amore; Marco Fazzari; Hong-Bin Jiang; Samuel K Luketich; Michael E Luketich; Richard Hoff; Daniel L Jacobs; Xinzhu Gu; Stephen F Badylak; Bruce A Freeman; William R Wagner
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Highly Aligned Nanofibrous Scaffold Derived from Decellularized Human Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Qi Xing; Caleb Vogt; Kam W Leong; Feng Zhao
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 18.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.