Laurie E McLouth1, C Graham Ford2, James E Pustejovsky3, Crystal L Park4, Allen C Sherman5, Kelly Trevino6, John M Salsman7. 1. Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA. 2. Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. 3. Department of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA. 4. Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA. 5. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA. 6. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York City, New York, USA. 7. Wake Forest School of Medicine and the Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
Objective: Spiritual well-being (SpWb) is an important dimension of health-related quality of life for many cancer patients. Accordingly, an increasing number of psychosocial intervention studies have included SpWb as a study endpoint, and may improve SpWb even if not designed explicitly to do so. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated effects of psychosocial interventions on SpWb in adults with cancer and tested potential moderators of intervention effects. Methods: Six literature databases were systematically searched to identify RCTs of psychosocial interventions in which SpWb was an outcome. Doctoral-level rater pairs extracted data using Covidence following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Standard meta-analytic techniques were applied, including meta-regression with robust variance estimation and risk-of-bias sensitivity analysis. Results: Forty-one RCTs were identified, encompassing 88 treatment effects among 3883 survivors. Interventions were associated with significant improvements in SpWb (g = 0.22, 95% CI [0.14, 0.29], p < 0.0001). Studies assessing the FACIT-Sp demonstrated larger effect sizes than did those using other measures of SpWb (g = 0.25, 95% CI [0.17, 0.34], vs. g = 0.10, 95% CI [-0.02, 0.23], p = 0.03]. No other intervention, clinical, or demographic characteristics significantly moderated effect size. Conclusions: Psychosocial interventions are associated with small-to-medium-sized effects on SpWb among cancer survivors. Future research should focus on conceptually coherent interventions explicitly targeting SpWb and evaluate interventions in samples that are diverse with respect to race and ethnicity, sex and cancer type.
Objective: Spiritual well-being (SpWb) is an important dimension of health-related quality of life for many cancer patients. Accordingly, an increasing number of psychosocial intervention studies have included SpWb as a study endpoint, and may improve SpWb even if not designed explicitly to do so. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated effects of psychosocial interventions on SpWb in adults with cancer and tested potential moderators of intervention effects. Methods: Six literature databases were systematically searched to identify RCTs of psychosocial interventions in which SpWb was an outcome. Doctoral-level rater pairs extracted data using Covidence following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Standard meta-analytic techniques were applied, including meta-regression with robust variance estimation and risk-of-bias sensitivity analysis. Results: Forty-one RCTs were identified, encompassing 88 treatment effects among 3883 survivors. Interventions were associated with significant improvements in SpWb (g = 0.22, 95% CI [0.14, 0.29], p < 0.0001). Studies assessing the FACIT-Sp demonstrated larger effect sizes than did those using other measures of SpWb (g = 0.25, 95% CI [0.17, 0.34], vs. g = 0.10, 95% CI [-0.02, 0.23], p = 0.03]. No other intervention, clinical, or demographic characteristics significantly moderated effect size. Conclusions: Psychosocial interventions are associated with small-to-medium-sized effects on SpWb among cancer survivors. Future research should focus on conceptually coherent interventions explicitly targeting SpWb and evaluate interventions in samples that are diverse with respect to race and ethnicity, sex and cancer type.
Authors: K Milbury; A Chaoul; K Biegler; T Wangyal; A Spelman; C A Meyers; B Arun; J L Palmer; J Taylor; L Cohen Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Carrie E Brintz; Orit Birnbaum-Weitzman; Erin L Merz; Frank J Penedo; Martha L Daviglus; Adelaide L Fortmann; Linda C Gallo; Patricia Gonzalez; Timothy P Johnson; Elena L Navas-Nacher; Marston E Youngblood; Maria M Llabre Journal: Psycholog Relig Spiritual Date: 2016-05-12
Authors: Sayna Bahraini; Wendy Gifford; Ian D Graham; Liquaa Wazni; Suzette Brémault-Phillips; Rebekah Hackbusch; Catrine Demers; Mary Egan Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2020-02
Authors: John M Salsman; James E Pustejovsky; Stephen M Schueller; Rosalba Hernandez; Mark Berendsen; Laurie E Steffen McLouth; Judith T Moskowitz Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Crystal L Park; James E Pustejovsky; Kelly Trevino; Allen C Sherman; Craig Esposito; Mark Berendsen; John M Salsman Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-04-29 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Teresa A Rummans; Matthew M Clark; Jeff A Sloan; Marlene H Frost; John Michael Bostwick; Pamela J Atherton; Mary E Johnson; Gail Gamble; Jarrett Richardson; Paul Brown; James Martensen; Janis Miller; Katherine Piderman; Mashele Huschka; Jean Girardi; Jean Hanson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Julio Cesar Tolentino; Ana Lucia Taboada Gjorup; Carolina Ribeiro Mello; Simone Gonçalves de Assis; André Casarsa Marques; Áureo do Carmo Filho; Hellen Rose Maia Salazar; Eelco van Duinkerken; Sergio Luis Schmidt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-03 Impact factor: 3.752