Literature DB >> 19823696

Audiovisual Spoken Word Recognition by Children with Cochlear Implants.

Karen Iler Kirk1, Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon, Rachael Frush Holt, Sujuan Gao, Rong Qi, Bethany L Gehrlein.   

Abstract

This study examined how prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants combine visual information from lipreading with auditory cues in an open-set speech perception task. A secondary aim was to examine lexical effects on the recognition of words in isolation and in sentences. Fifteen children with cochlear implants served as participants in this study. Participants were administered two tests of spoken word recognition. The LNT assessed isolated word recognition in an auditory-only format. The AV-LNST assessed recognition of key words in sentences in a visual-only, auditory-only and audiovisual presentation format. On each test, lexical characteristics of the stimulus items were controlled to assess the effects of lexical competition. The children also were administered a test of receptive vocabulary knowledge. The results revealed that recognition of key words was significantly influenced by presentation format. Audiovisual speech perception was best, followed by auditory-only and visual-only presentation, respectively. Lexical effects on spoken word recognition were evident for isolated words, but not when words were presented in sentences. Finally, there was a significant relationship between auditory-only and audiovisual word recognition and language knowledge. The results demonstrate that children with cochlear implants obtain significant benefit from audiovisual speech integration, and suggest such tests should be included in test batteries intended to evaluate cochlear implant outcomes.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 19823696      PMCID: PMC2759184          DOI: 10.1080/16513860701673892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Med        ISSN: 1651-3835


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of children's familiarity with tokens on the PBK, LNT, and MLNT.

Authors:  K I Kirk; S T Sehgal; M Hay-McCutcheon
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

2.  Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Adam R Kaiser; Karen Iler Kirk; Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Development of audiovisual comprehension skills in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tonya R Bergeson; David B Pisoni; Rebecca A O Davis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Improved speech perception in adult congenitally deafened cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Stephanie Moody-Antonio; Sumiko Takayanagi; Ann Masuda; Edward T Auer; Laurel Fisher; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  The cochlear implant: a search for answers.

Authors:  G M Clark
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2000-03

7.  Auditory and audiovisual reception of words in low-frequency noise by children with normal hearing and by children with impaired hearing.

Authors:  N P Erber
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1971-09

8.  Auditory-visual speech perception and auditory-visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults.

Authors:  Mitchell S Sommers; Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effects of amplification and speechreading on consonant recognition by persons with impaired hearing.

Authors:  B E Walden; K W Grant; M T Cord
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  9 in total

1.  Studies in pediatric hearing loss at the House Research Institute.

Authors:  Laurie S Eisenberg; Karen C Johnson; Amy S Martinez; Leslie Visser-Dumont; Dianne Hammes Ganguly; Jennifer F Still
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Effects of contextual cues on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Gail Donaldson; Ala Somarowthu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Executive functioning and speech-language skills following long-term use of cochlear implants.

Authors:  William G Kronenberger; Bethany G Colson; Shirley C Henning; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2014-06-05

4.  Audiovisual Enhancement of Speech Perception in Noise by School-Age Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.

Authors:  Kaylah Lalonde; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Simultaneous communication supports learning in noise by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Helen Blom; Marc Marschark; Elizabeth Machmer
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2016-12-23

6.  Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Ryan A Stevenson; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 7.  Multisensory Integration in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Sterling W Sheffield; Iliza M Butera; René H Gifford; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Comparing Auditory-Only and Audiovisual Word Learning for Children With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Jena McDaniel; Stephen Camarata; Paul Yoder
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2018-10-01

9.  Audiovisual speech perception at various presentation levels in Mandarin-speaking adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Shu-Yu Liu; Grace Yu; Li-Ang Lee; Tien-Chen Liu; Yung-Ting Tsou; Te-Jen Lai; Che-Ming Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.