Literature DB >> 17703051

Combining models of protein translation and population genetics to predict protein production rates from codon usage patterns.

Michael A Gilchrist1.   

Abstract

Genes are often biased in their codon usage. The degree of bias displayed often changes with expression level and intragenic position. Numerous indices, such as the codon adaptation index, have been developed to measure this bias. Although the expression level of a gene and index values are correlated, the heuristic nature of these metrics limits their ability to explain this relationship. As an alternative approach, this study integrates mechanistic models of cellular and population processes in a nested manner to develop a stochastic evolutionary model of a protein's production rate (SEMPPR). SEMPPR assumes that the evolution of codon bias is driven by selection to reduce the cost of nonsense errors and that this selection is counteracted by mutation and drift. Through the application of Bayes' theorem, SEMPPR generates a posterior probability distribution for the protein production rate of a given gene. Conceptually, SEMPPR's predictions are based on the degree of adaptation to reduce the cost of nonsense errors observed in the codon usage pattern of the gene. As an illustration, SEMPPR was parameterized using the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome and its predictions tested using available empirical data. The results indicate that SEMPPR's predictions are as reliable index based ones. In addition, SEMPPR's output is more easily interpreted and its predictions could be improved through refinements of the models upon which it is built.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17703051     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  19 in total

1.  Measuring and detecting molecular adaptation in codon usage against nonsense errors during protein translation.

Authors:  Michael A Gilchrist; Premal Shah; Russell Zaretzki
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Explaining complex codon usage patterns with selection for translational efficiency, mutation bias, and genetic drift.

Authors:  Premal Shah; Michael A Gilchrist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comprehensive analysis of stop codon usage in bacteria and its correlation with release factor abundance.

Authors:  Gürkan Korkmaz; Mikael Holm; Tobias Wiens; Suparna Sanyal
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Interspecific and intragenic differences in codon usage bias among vertebrate myosin heavy-chain genes.

Authors:  Mikio C Aoi; Bryan C Rourke
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Predictive biophysical modeling and understanding of the dynamics of mRNA translation and its evolution.

Authors:  Hadas Zur; Tamir Tuller
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Quantifying shifts in natural selection on codon usage between protein regions: a population genetics approach.

Authors:  Alexander L Cope; Michael A Gilchrist
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.547

7.  The Key Parameters that Govern Translation Efficiency.

Authors:  Dan D Erdmann-Pham; Khanh Dao Duc; Yun S Song
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 10.304

8.  Rate-limiting steps in yeast protein translation.

Authors:  Premal Shah; Yang Ding; Malwina Niemczyk; Grzegorz Kudla; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Effect of correlated tRNA abundances on translation errors and evolution of codon usage bias.

Authors:  Premal Shah; Michael A Gilchrist
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  RiboAbacus: a model trained on polyribosome images predicts ribosome density and translational efficiency from mammalian transcriptomes.

Authors:  Fabio Lauria; Toma Tebaldi; Lorenzo Lunelli; Paolo Struffi; Pamela Gatto; Andrea Pugliese; Maurizio Brigotti; Lorenzo Montanaro; Yari Ciribilli; Alberto Inga; Alessandro Quattrone; Guido Sanguinetti; Gabriella Viero
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.