Literature DB >> 19821926

Accommodation response and visual discomfort.

Chinatsu Tosha1, Eric Borsting, William H Ridder, Chris Chase.   

Abstract

Although visual discomfort symptoms associated with near work have been correlated with clinical measures of accommodation, studies using objective recordings have not found corresponding deficits in accommodative function. One problem with previous studies is that accommodation measures have been too brief to assess accommodative fatigue. This study examined steady state accommodative responses among a college population with visual discomfort, over a 90-s time period. Thirty-one participants were grouped into high (n = 15) or low visual discomfort groups (n = 16) based on their scores on the Conlon Visual Discomfort Survey. Using the WAM-5500 autorefractor, accommodation responses were recorded at 5 Hz for two consecutive minutes at five viewing distances. The results showed a significant interaction between the high and low discomfort groups over time in accommodation response. The high discomfort group showed an increase in accommodative lag, whereas the low discomfort group had a stable response. Our study suggests that the high visual discomfort group is characterized by accommodative fatigue, with a higher lag of accommodation developing at a near viewing distance over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19821926     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00687.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  18 in total

1.  Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder children exhibit an impaired accommodative response.

Authors:  Beatriz Redondo; Jesús Vera; Rubén Molina; José Antonio García; Miriam Ouadi; Antonio Muñoz-Hoyos; Raimundo Jiménez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Association between ADHD and vision problems. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alessio Bellato; John Perna; Preethi S Ganapathy; Marco Solmi; Andrea Zampieri; Samuele Cortese; Stephen V Faraone
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 13.437

3.  Tonic accommodation predicts closed-loop accommodation responses.

Authors:  Chunming Liu; Stefanie A Drew; Eric Borsting; Amy Escobar; Lawrence Stark; Christopher Chase
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Effect of test duration on the visual-evoked potential (VEP) and alpha-wave responses.

Authors:  Kevin T Willeford; Kenneth J Ciuffreda; Naveen K Yadav
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Visual discomfort and depth-of-field.

Authors:  Louise O'Hare; Tingting Zhang; Harold T Nefs; Paul B Hibbard
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-05-16

6.  Accommodative changes after SMILE for moderate to high myopia correction.

Authors:  Ke Zheng; Tian Han; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Development of the Japanese version of the Visual Discomfort Scale.

Authors:  Shu Imaizumi; Shinichi Koyama; Yoshihiko Tanno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Influence of virtual reality on visual parameters: immersive versus non-immersive mode.

Authors:  Hyeon Jeong Yoon; Jonghwa Kim; Sang Woo Park; Hwan Heo
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Effects of prolonged continuous computer gaming on physical and ocular symptoms and binocular vision functions in young healthy individuals.

Authors:  Ji-Woo Lee; Hyun Gug Cho; Byeong-Yeon Moon; Sang-Yeob Kim; Dong-Sik Yu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Accommodative Response in Patients with Central Field Loss: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Ali Mazyed Alsaqr; Hisham AlShareef; Faisal Alhajri; Ali Abusharha; Raied Fagehi; Ahmad Alharbi; Saud Alanazi
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.