Literature DB >> 19816231

Hearing results using the SMart piston prosthesis.

Jose N Fayad1, Maroun T Semaan, Josh C Meier, John W House.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: SMart, a newly introduced piston prosthesis for stapedotomy, is a nitinol-based, heat-activated, self-crimping prosthesis. We review our hearing results and postoperative complications using this self-crimped piston prosthesis and compare them with those obtained using stainless steel or platinum piston prostheses. HYPOTHESIS: Audiometric results using the SMart piston are identical to those obtained using a conventional piston prosthesis. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Private neurotologic tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: The 416 ears reviewed included 306 with a SMart prosthesis and 110 conventional prostheses. 61% were women. Mean follow-up time was 5.6 (standard deviation [SD], 6.3 mo) and 6.9 months (SD, 7.0 mo) for the 2 groups, respectively. INTERVENTION: Stapedotomy using the SMart or a conventional (non-SMart) prosthesis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Audiometric hearing results, including pure-tone average (PTA) and air-bone gap (ABG), and prevalence of postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Mean postoperative PTA was 32.6 (SD, 16.8) dB for the SMart group and 29.4 (SD, 13.5) dB for the non-SMart group, with ABGs of 7.6 (SD, 8.9) and 6.0 (SD, 5.2) dB, respectively. Mean change (decrease) in ABG was 18.7 (SD, 13.1) dB for the SMart group and 19.9 (SD, 10.3) dB for the non-SMart group. High-frequency bone PTAs showed overclosure of 2.0 (SD, 7.9) dB for the SMart group and 3.6 (SD, 8.6) dB for the non-SMart group. Postoperative vertigo and tinnitus were infrequent. No significant differences in these audiometric outcomes or complication rates were noted between groups. There was no significant difference in rate of gap closure to within 10 dB (78.3 versus 84.2%, SMart and non-SMart, respectively) or 20 dB (94.2 and 98.0%).
CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional stapes prostheses, the nitinol-based SMart is a safe and reliable stapes prosthesis that eliminates manual crimping without significantly altering the audiometric outcome. Complications are rare, but longer follow-up is needed before establishing long-term stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19816231     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181be645d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  10 in total

1.  [Development and validation of the Stapesplasty Outcome Test 25 (SPOT-25)].

Authors:  S Lailach; T Schenke; I Baumann; H Walter; M Praetorius; T Beleites; T Zahnert; M Neudert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Comparison between Fluoroplastic and Platinum/Titanium Piston in Stapedotomy: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study.

Authors:  Mohammad Faramarzi; Sareh Roosta; Niloofar Daneshian
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.017

3.  KTP laser stapedotomy with a self-crimping, thermal shape memory Nitinol piston: follow-up study reporting intermediate-term hearing.

Authors:  Imre Gerlinger; Péter Bakó; Zalán Piski; Péter Révész; Gábor Ráth; Tamás Karosi; László Lujber
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Living with otosclerosis: disease-specific health-related quality-of-life measurement in patients undergoing stapes surgery.

Authors:  Susen Lailach; Tina Schenke; Ingo Baumann; Hannah Walter; Mark Praetorius; Thomas Beleites; Thomas Zahnert; Marcus Neudert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Energy extraction from the biologic battery in the inner ear.

Authors:  Patrick P Mercier; Andrew C Lysaght; Saurav Bandyopadhyay; Anantha P Chandrakasan; Konstantina M Stankovic
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  An "Uncrimped" SMart Stapes Prosthesis: A Cause of Late Hearing Deterioration in Otosclerosis.

Authors:  Premjit S Randhawa; Nicholas Hamilton; Antony A Narula
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2012-01-31

7.  Comparison of Fluoroplastic Causse Loop Piston and Titanium Soft-Clip in Stapedotomy.

Authors:  Mohammad Faramarzi; Nafiseh Gilanifar; Sareh Roosta
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-01

8.  Nitinol versus non-Nitinol prostheses in otosclerosis surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Roque Reis; M Donato; G Almeida; L Castelhano; P Escada
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.124

9.  Evaluating hearing results in stapedotomy: Comparison of fluoroplastic Causse loop piston and Matrix prosthesis.

Authors:  Mohammad Faramarzi; Pegah Pedramfard; Sareh Roosta; Tayebeh Kazemi; Hanie Aboughadare
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-04

10.  Audiometric evaluation after stapedotomy with Fisch titanium prosthesis.

Authors:  Andre Luiz de Ataide; Gerson Linck Bichinho; Tatiana Mauad Patruni
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013 May-Jun
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.